|
Post by genghis on Aug 29, 2017 19:09:34 GMT
Croc? More like 'croc of s***'. That's all you post. So, City lost a football match? It's no big deal, they will lose plenty more before the season is out. I don't care about managers apologies, they aren't necessary, especially not 4 games into a season. Win the first 3, it doesn't make you a good team, lose one and it doesn't make you a bad team. It'll take a couple of months for all teams to figure out where they are, and it's what the team is doing come December, that's when it matters. And if Snapes no good, he'll be long gone, just like any other manager It was Snape's first league opportunity to show his capability as a manager - and he failed miserably. I might be more patient if it wasn't for his unprofessional behaviour off the pitch.
|
|
|
Post by genghis on Aug 29, 2017 10:54:36 GMT
Sorry for the name mix up, so many new faces this season, after a long day in the sun. I didn't see Lee Hughes on the touch line to support his joint manager John Snape , for a important game ? . The lack of discipline in the second half was a worry and Tyler Weir was the main culprit and was lucky to stay on the pitch, got jeered by the home crowd. Tyler seems to lose the plot and should be setting a example as captain, not kicking the ball out of the ground when he missed a penalty against Loughborough in frustration. The two main concerns are the sloppy goals we gave away and needs to be addressed and the lack of threat up front , we lack any pace to break and a forward who has the physical strength to hold the ball up. Our joint managers need to learn from this game and prepare for the next game away at Long Eaton United to get us back to winning ways. John Snape was right to say sorry to the loyal travelling supporters for his sides poor showing in the second half, well said John on this one. This season is going to be a tough one for everyone in a new league and our side is a side started from fresh and needs to gel and mould together, I have spoke to supporters who say we will walk this league, not when you have teams like Coventry United and Coleshill Town challenging for promotion. As a club we all need to pull together on and off the pitch to have goal for the future, the board and the trust need to heal their past disputes and have proper business plans in place to get the club back to Worcester. I'm sure Hughes had a legitimate reason for not being there. Hearing he wasn't there explains a lot. I hope this has exposed John Snape's inability to manage a football team to you all. He can stick his apology. No doubt he put all of the blame on the lads and took no accountability himself. Snape in a nutshell.
|
|
|
Post by genghis on Aug 28, 2017 21:53:56 GMT
Don't get the chance to go to many away games. Tonight was no exception. Abysmal result. Still getting to know the new players so it's far too early to identify the weak links. However, I am surprised that Palmer let 3 goals in. His positioning has been excellent from what I've seen so far - beyond his level. I can only assume that it was either a poor showing from the defence again or John Snape's abysmal attempt at a half-time talk sent him (and the rest of the team) out for the 2nd half with a poor mindset. Enough is enough. Time to send Snape and his lackeys packing. I do say, actually zeke. I say a lot more than a guy who posts memes all day. Do you send them to your buddy Snape via social media? I bet you have a good laugh together. You have similar humour.
|
|
|
Post by genghis on Aug 28, 2017 20:59:24 GMT
Don't get the chance to go to many away games. Tonight was no exception.
Abysmal result. Still getting to know the new players so it's far too early to identify the weak links. However, I am surprised that Palmer let 3 goals in. His positioning has been excellent from what I've seen so far - beyond his level. I can only assume that it was either a poor showing from the defence again or John Snape's abysmal attempt at a half-time talk sent him (and the rest of the team) out for the 2nd half with a poor mindset.
Enough is enough. Time to send Snape and his lackeys packing.
|
|
|
Post by genghis on Aug 27, 2017 21:15:03 GMT
Actually, if you knew anything about football (or even did the stadium tour at Chelsea) you'd know that it goes on in the Premier League too. Some clubs apparently don't put toilet paper in the away changing rooms. I did a conference at Old Trafford some years back, and we ended up down near the pitch , in the tunnels underneath, and through to the away changing rooms, which Ferguson had refurbished, to include a lino floor which was lethal and slippy even when dry, a refrigerated drinks machine, which was empty, and was also behind the door out of the changing room. Dirty tricks abound at all levels. Mmhm. There was certainly none of that at Villa.
|
|
|
Post by genghis on Aug 27, 2017 18:32:58 GMT
Nearly won the halftime draw. Ah well. Was a lucky result in truth. City played well, but were certainly not the better team. Defence was really shaky. Was hilarious to see Snape raging at the poor defending in the first half. No doubt his own shortcomings as a manager (of which there are many) were overlooked in the halftime talk. Did John Snape have a poo at half time? Or was he too busy drunkenly flirting with the WAGS ? I'm sure BlueandWhite Flag knows the answer to that. However, Snape's prank of 'stinking up the place'', as he referred to it, he would only away do at away grounds. Such juvenile behaviour from someone who delusionally believes themselves to be capable of managing at premier league standard one day. I'm sure Alex Ferguson never engaged in such activities.
|
|
|
Post by genghis on Aug 27, 2017 14:03:29 GMT
Can we just talk about footy please? Nobody really cares that you don't like the manager, Genghis, nobody on here is in his pocket either. We watched the City before he arrived and will do so after his departure. You get managerial shortcomings in non-league, same as you get player shortcomings. At the end of the day we all want the City to win, don't we? If that's your opinion, then why not call out BlueAndWhite Flag on his fanatical devotion to John Snape too? The same logic should apply. No-one gets criticised for their berating of Hampson and the Board either. Yes, we should all want City to win. Acknowledging threats to the club are part of this mindset.
|
|
|
Post by genghis on Aug 27, 2017 10:12:04 GMT
Nearly won the halftime draw. Ah well. Was a lucky result in truth. City played well, but were certainly not the better team. Defence was really shaky. Was hilarious to see Snape raging at the poor defending in the first half. No doubt his own shortcomings as a manager (of which there are many) were overlooked in the halftime talk. Ohhh look another post where you can't help yourself I've noticed you have made no posts since my last one. Funny you had nothing to say until someone speaks Ill of your hero Snape. What exactly does Snape pay you for? To patrol message boards making sure no-one says anything unfavourable about him?
|
|
|
Post by genghis on Aug 26, 2017 23:08:55 GMT
Nearly won the halftime draw. Ah well.
Was a lucky result in truth. City played well, but were certainly not the better team. Defence was really shaky.
Was hilarious to see Snape raging at the poor defending in the first half. No doubt his own shortcomings as a manager (of which there are many) were overlooked in the halftime talk.
|
|
|
Post by genghis on Aug 22, 2017 9:51:16 GMT
Does this knob have to suffocate every thread? I'm reluctant to ban anyone from the board, but this clown is stifling every discussion on here. What are you talking about? I devoted one sentence to John Snape in my first post in this thread. It wasn't even the focus of my post. Every post I've made after has been in response to someone else who seems dead keen to discuss that and only that. How am I suffocating this thread exactly, knob?
|
|
|
Post by genghis on Aug 21, 2017 20:33:16 GMT
One sentence on John Snape, and that's all you focused on. It's all most the people in this thread focused on. If you all don't care about him so much then why keep harping on at me over it?
Every other post in this thread bar the first has been in response to someone.
|
|
|
Post by genghis on Aug 21, 2017 20:01:34 GMT
If you weren't taking notice, you wouldn't reply. Instead, I seem to be personally attacked for my views and users such as thatloudbloke defend John Snape relentlessly. As Mahatma Gandhi once said: "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." The users of this site just clearly skipped the first step. That was just an example of the juvenile character of John Snape. A character which is not suited to managing a brothel, let alone a football club. If you want to sack the board, I have no objections. What I object to is the complete denial of the culpability of Snape in WCFC's current plight. Just like you came on and in your first post...and every post since have "personally attacked" John Snape ? And your 1 post mate who did the same ? Try making 1 post on this site without mentioning his name or making any reference to him....maybe then me and a number of others can start to take your views on board. Give us your views on the game and the referee decisions etc Second post in this thread is mine, and the first thing I talked about was Chasetown's keeper not getting sent off for handling the ball outside the area. This was before anyone else talked about it. I'd have been happy to give a more in-depth analysis of the match. Unfortunately, you and a few others wanted to turn this thread into the clown show. I made one comment on John Snape and that's all you want to pick up on.
|
|
|
Post by genghis on Aug 21, 2017 17:59:00 GMT
The thing is though Genghis, we don't take any notice of the accusations you make against Our Heavenly Father John Snape, mainly because you make so many wild and varied accusations. Therefore, we all think you are as nutty as a fruitcake, and laugh at you. If you weren't taking notice, you wouldn't reply. Instead, I seem to be personally attacked for my views and users such as thatloudbloke defend John Snape relentlessly. As Mahatma Gandhi once said: "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." The users of this site just clearly skipped the first step. "Sack the Board!!" because they have overseen and been party to the biggest decline and failure of the company in over 100 years, broke, homeless, and dropped three leagues, and still failing. " No! Sack John Snape!!" because he has a poo and doesnt pull the chain after !! That was just an example of the juvenile character of John Snape. A character which is not suited to managing a brothel, let alone a football club. If you want to sack the board, I have no objections. What I object to is the complete denial of the culpability of Snape in WCFC's current plight.
|
|
|
Post by genghis on Aug 21, 2017 16:21:11 GMT
Already explained my logic. Not my problem you can't understand that. Actually you haven't - logic with you has been as evident as WMDs in Saddam's garden shed or sensible decisions from Hampson, Hallmark and co. What you've spewed forth are a load of vague allegations and statements of hate and malpractice with no actual supporting evidence. So don't be playing the victim card - as wise men once said "Publish or be damned" and "s*** or get off the pot" He asked me why I bought tickets to matches despite my feelings towards John Snape, and I explained my reasons for doing so. How does not qualify as logic? You can disagree with my logic, but it's still my logic. As such, your WMD comparison makes no sense. The other stuff you talked about isn't relevant to this discussion. Though ironically, I have explained those too.
|
|
|
Post by genghis on Aug 20, 2017 17:48:45 GMT
I'm paying towards the players wages too. You're calling me an idiot for that? Snape will find a way of getter by his money whether fans turn up to the game or not. The lads won't. Boycotting the club isn't the answer. If I had the same obsession about Snape as you do, I would definitely boycot the games. Fortunately I have never been so overwhelmingly obsessed by someone That I had so much hatred for Already explained my logic. Not my problem you can't understand that.
|
|
|
Post by genghis on Aug 20, 2017 17:26:57 GMT
The fact you were there and paying towards Snape's wages, means you're either a wind up merchant or an idiot. Seeing as a wind up involves more than repeating the same old tired accusations, I'm voting for the second answer I'm paying towards the players wages too. You're calling me an idiot for that? Snape will find a way of getting his money whether fans turn up to the game or not. The lads won't. Boycotting the club isn't the answer.
|
|
|
Post by genghis on Aug 20, 2017 16:45:15 GMT
Their keeper should have been off. Poor refereeing.
Poor performance overall by City. The Snape effect is clearly setting in.
|
|
|
Post by genghis on Aug 19, 2017 19:44:47 GMT
Going at two different users for disagreeing with your assessment of John Snape. I only asked for you to get a talking to. Even if I find your views and association with John Snape reprehensible, I don't ask for people to get banned unlike some on this site. How am i associated with him ? You dont even know who I am. If you look at the date I registered you will see that ive been supporting this Club for a fair few years so I am not someone who has jumped on this site to defend someone....and I havent jumped on this site to slag someone off like some. So me and a few others want you removed...the moderators are not going to give us a talking to about wanting you kicked off....more like they would talk to you about your behaviour. I hope for your sake that John Snape or any "lackeys" havent taken snapshots or printscreens of your accusations....you could find yourself in hot water with little evidence to back up your claims! And now threats! I haven't asked for you to be banned for your opinions, but clearly Snape's boys have no such class.
|
|
|
Post by genghis on Aug 19, 2017 15:47:01 GMT
I agree. The likes of BlueandWhiteFlag and Teej need a stern talking to about their actions. What have I done ? Apart from argue againt the crap you spout Going at two different users for disagreeing with your assessment of John Snape. I only asked for you to get a talking to. Even if I find your views and association with John Snape reprehensible, I don't ask for people to get banned unlike some on this site.
|
|
|
Post by genghis on Aug 19, 2017 15:44:26 GMT
Surely publicising someone's address must be against the rules of this board!! This idiot should be deleted & barred from here Rest assured Jimbo that Tim Munslow does not live in Haig Avenue. That address will only mean something to one person on here. I haven't a clue what you're talking about now.
|
|
|
Post by genghis on Aug 19, 2017 10:27:13 GMT
I agree. The likes of BlueandWhiteFlag and Teej need a stern talking to about their actions.
|
|
|
Genghis
Aug 19, 2017 0:02:51 GMT
via mobile
Post by genghis on Aug 19, 2017 0:02:51 GMT
The truth is funny, you say? Ok then. I'm unsure of your stance. I'm certain that BlueandWhiteflag, Niels and Teej are in league with John Snape. But the likes of you and thatloudbloke I think have just fallen victim to Snape's lies. Plot firmly irretrievably lost. Anyone who knows me (and that is almost all of you I'd think) knows I have no time for John Snape and was very disappointed at his getting the job. I was actually one of those who hoped that GenghsorryJacko got the job, but never mind, as I am now apparently in league with John Snape. Of all the shite that Genghis has come up with, this is just about the most unlikely. A bit like announcing Alan Shearer as a Sunderland fan! If what you say is true, then I'm very confused by your actions. Why would somebody with a distaste for Snape be so concerned with trying to silence the truth about him? I'm not Jacko, give it up.
|
|
|
Post by genghis on Aug 18, 2017 23:58:04 GMT
I think the moderators of this site should "out" Genghis so that we all know who he is; he can then be confronted and we can inspect the truth of these apparently scandalous accusations. If not true then they are libellous. And I don't hide behind a pseudonym. Don't you live in Hallow Village? I recognise your name. Don't know why you're so concerned with 'outing' me. What you seem to be suggesting is some form of lynch mob. Even for Snape's boys, that's pretty extreme.
|
|
|
Post by genghis on Aug 17, 2017 21:32:23 GMT
Explain lackey ? Sounds like a bouncer Dictionary definition of Lackey = A brownish European moth of woods and hedgerows, the caterpillars of which live communally in a silken tent on the food tree. Just about sums up genghis' mad ramblings. Google 'lackey' and what you posted is the second definition. Interesting that you didn't post the first. Are you trying to hide something? Synonyms for 'lackey' include flunkey and stooge. It doesn't really matter which is used, all I know is that John Snape has a lot of them.
|
|
|
Post by genghis on Aug 16, 2017 10:10:31 GMT
Are you serious? After all you've said about Snape, what a bete noir he is? How he's got Hampson in some kind of headlock? How his lackeys are doing his dirty work, have infiltrated the Trust, and built his house extension? You mean that after all that, his plans for world domination and the destruction of Worcester City have been undone by his underling? Dammit! Thats buggered his plans for Poland! Up until the world domination part, everything there is true. Although knowing the character of John Snape I'm sure he fantasises of such things. I don't even think that he would bat an eye at the destruction of WCFC. This would allow the creation of a 'community owned' replacement club with himself at the helm. You may think it's ridiculous, but I wouldn't be surprised to see the existence of 'Snape United' within the next few years.
|
|
|
Post by genghis on Aug 15, 2017 22:44:14 GMT
It's very encouraging to see that Lee Hughes' influence is trumping John Snape's. It's the only logical explanation. Maybe there is hope after all.
|
|
|
Genghis
Aug 15, 2017 20:36:55 GMT
via mobile
Post by genghis on Aug 15, 2017 20:36:55 GMT
People are laughing at him not with him. He's a pillock.. And you are a lost cause. I'd say more, but I don't want to use inappropriate language on a child friendly site.
|
|
|
Genghis
Aug 15, 2017 16:52:11 GMT
via mobile
Post by genghis on Aug 15, 2017 16:52:11 GMT
we mock you because you are funny The truth is funny, you say? Ok then. I'm unsure of your stance. I'm certain that BlueandWhiteflag, Niels and Teej are in league with John Snape. But the likes of you and thatloudbloke I think have just fallen victim to Snape's lies.
|
|
|
Genghis
Aug 15, 2017 16:05:15 GMT
via mobile
Post by genghis on Aug 15, 2017 16:05:15 GMT
Who are you exactly, Zeke? The site clown? No! I think you well and truly secured that title for yourself some time ago. I'm sure you would like that. You mock me because you fear what I'm saying. You're one of Snape's lackeys in the Trust, are you not?
|
|
|
Genghis
Aug 15, 2017 14:35:58 GMT
via mobile
Post by genghis on Aug 15, 2017 14:35:58 GMT
Pretty certain I don't need someone else to tell me my own date of birth. Nice try with attempting to besmirch not only my name, but the name of an upstanding player. If we're throwing out accusations, you just revealed yourself as one of Snape's lackeys with your actions. DRINK! Who are you exactly, Zeke? The site clown?
|
|