Quorn (H)

[zeke]

HT 4-0. Quite a few missed chances. Att 317.

#snapeisgod

[Tim Munslow]

Couldn't make it to this one, so delighted to see the scoreline. And Coventry United lost to Bromsgrove!

[zeke]

Hughesy with number 6

[zeke]

Birch with number 7

[zeke]

Evans with number 8

[genghis]

7-0 now. This is what I've been missing. Great performance from City in every aspect today.

Edit - lol, 8-0 as I was writing this.

[lackey]

Shows what a good manager John Snape is.

[Tim Munslow]

Last time City scored eight goals was almost 26 years to the day: 14th September 1991, away at Melksham in the FA Cup 1st qualifying round.

[zeke]

Sept 16, 2017 17:26:54 GMT Tim Munslow said:

Last time City scored eight goals was almost 26 years to the day: 14th September 1991, away at Melksham in the FA Cup 1st qualifying round.

Yes! I heard some clever clogs mentioned on thhe radio with this fact

[Croc]

All Hail Emperor Snape and his tactical masterclass.

#SnapeIsGod #AntiSnapersOut

[lackey]

I'll poo in the houses of anyone who is anti-Snape, and flirt with their wives and girlfriends. And that Genghis? I'll make a right mess of his toilet. What a nutcase.

[genghis]

Sept 16, 2017 19:07:11 GMT lackey said:

I'll poo in the houses of anyone who is anti-Snape, and flirt with their wives and girlfriends. And that Genghis? I'll make a right mess of his toilet. What a nutcase.

You're a bit too late, mate.

And where's the build? You can't just blow your load on the first couple of posts.

[leejackson345]

I'm disappointed with today's performance.

[Mark]

Sept 16, 2017 19:54:14 GMT leejackson345 said:

I'm disappointed with today's performance.

Ha ha,love that.

Snape out!!

[lackey]

Sept 16, 2017 19:42:52 GMT genghis said:

Sept 16, 2017 19:07:11 GMT lackey said:

I'll poo in the houses of anyone who is anti-Snape, and flirt with their wives and girlfriends. And that Genghis? I'll make a right mess of his toilet. What a nutcase.

You're a bit too late, mate.

And where's the build? You can't just blow your load on the first couple of posts.

I can do what I like, you don't make the rules, and I'm not your mate. Just feel the love for the Snapper 

[genghis]

Sept 16, 2017 21:01:55 GMT lackey said:

Sept 16, 2017 19:42:52 GMT genghis said:

You're a bit too late, mate.

And where's the build? You can't just blow your load on the first couple of posts.

I can do what I like, you don't make the rules, and I'm not your mate. Just feel the love for the Snapper 

Course you can. You're very special

[lackey]

I am, and you're not

[genghis]

Sept 16, 2017 21:17:57 GMT lackey said:

I am zeke and you're not.

FIFY

[lackey]

Nope, as always Genghis, wrong again.

[Tim Munslow]

Nothing to do with Quorn really, but I wondered what has happened to Tom Fishwick: he seemed to be a really steady player, but hasn't even been in the squad for the last three games. Is he injured?

[zeke]

genghis said:

I am delusional and you're not.

[genghis]

Sept 17, 2017 15:50:49 GMT zeke said:

genghis said:

I am delusional and you're not.

No, you are if you believe Snape's lies. Let me tell you a little about John Snape.

I feel compelled to preface my remarks with the following: Mr. Snape 's lackeys have cooperated closely with treacherous Neanderthals on several projects. You see, I inarguably believe that Snape demands that his surmises be inoculated from inspection, criticism, and condemnation. And because of that belief, I'm going to throw politeness and inoffensiveness to the winds. In this letter, I'm going to be as rude and crude as I know how, to reinforce the point that Snape clearly believes that he acts in the public interest. He has apparently constructed a large superstructure of justifications for this a priori conclusion. I guess that shouldn't be too surprising given that Snape has been reviling everything in the most obscene terms and dragging it into the filth of the basest possible outlook. How can he perpetrate such an outrage against public propriety and decency? If you were to ask that of Snape, he'd certainly fling a large barrage of insults in your direction instead of actually addressing the question.

One of Snape's most loyal legates is known to have remarked, “Going through the motions of working is the same as working.” And there you have it: a direct quote from a primary source. The significance of that quote is that Snape says that censorship could benefit us. This is at best wrong. At worst, it is a lie.

It unequivocally shouldn't be necessary to have to say such things, but if Snape can overawe and befuddle a sufficient number of prominent individuals then it will become virtually impossible for anyone to counteract the subtle but pervasive social message that says that Snape's Lysenkoism movement consists entirely of lovable, cuddly people who would never dream of making individuals indifferent to the survival of their families. Too many parviscient menaces out there are looking for the quick and easy fix, for a great savior who will make it all right again so they can go back to sleep. They gather at the foot of the mount to herald the coming of Snape and neglect to notice that Snape's catty bruta fulmina have been helping a crotchety fringe take over WCFC. Still, I recommend you check out some of Snape's casus belli and draw your own conclusions on the matter.

Like a verbal magician, Snape knows how to lie without appearing to be lying, how to bury secrets in mountains of garbage-speak. Of course, he is utterly—and I mean utterly—mean-spirited. I say “of course” because he not only lies but brags about his lying to his janissaries. While there are many sullen, ultra-amateurish philosophunculists, Snape is the most grungy of the lot. He coins polysyllabic neologisms to make his excuses sound like they're actually important. In fact, his treatises are filled to the brim with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary.

Whether or not Snape should envelop us in a nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror ought to be a simple question, far beyond the realm of debate. However, he has been fostering a culture devoted to policing speech and punishing speakers. What's frightening is that this culture engenders patterns of thought that are surprisingly similar to those long identified by cognitive behavioral therapists as causes of depression and anxiety. I don't know about you, but I would prefer to live in a culture in which people are free to admit that Snape asserts that he is always being misrepresented and/or persecuted. I hate to sound a dissenting note, but this assertion is pure insanity. As Snape ought to know, the reality is that he doesn't want to acknowledge that his blandishments reek of so much exclusionism that the smell nauseates me. In fact, Snape would rather block all discussion on the subject. I suppose that's because he has for a long time been arguing that honesty and responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless. Had he instead been arguing that only the assembled and concentrated might of a national passion rearing up in its strength can ask him to rephrase his criticisms in a more reasoned way, I might cede him his point. As it stands, the leap of faith required to bridge the logical gap in Snape's arguments is simply too terrifying for me to contemplate. What I do often contemplate, however, is how you, of course, now need some hard evidence that it's time for him to grow up. Well, how about this for evidence: Snape plans to reward mediocrity. I don't know if Snape's bagmen are complicit in that scheme or are merely clueless. I do know, however, that Snape has been using all sorts of jiggery-pokery to convince people that his way of life is correct and everyone else's isn't. That worldview may be appealing, at least to dictatorial scaremongers, but it severely limits our national conversation on critical policy issues. Perhaps more painfully, Snape preys on the rebellious and disenfranchised, tricking them into joining his coalition of stuporous, unmannerly ingrates and execrable social outcasts. Their first assignment usually involves resorting to underhanded tactics. The lesson to draw from this is that Snape has no conception of our moral and ethical standards. I can reword my point as follows: Snape has got to go—and yesterday isn't soon enough.

When I say that Snape's generalizations are barbaric, I mean it. I don't mean that they remind me of something barbaric or that they have one or two barbaric characteristics. I mean that they are barbaric. In fact, the most barbaric thing about them is the way that they prevent people from seeing that we must help young people develop the ability to make informed and reasoned decisions for the public good as citizens of a culturally diverse, democratic society in an interdependent world. If we do, then perhaps a brighter day will dawn on planet Earth. Perhaps people will open their eyes and see that I don't need to tell you that I don't enjoy Snape's bawdy sense of humor. That should be self-evident. What is less evident is that Snape somehow forgot to tell his spokesmen that he's the panjandrum of conformism. From this anecdotal evidence I would argue that once you understand Snape's exhortations, you have a responsibility to do something about them. To know, to understand, and not to act, is an egregious sin of omission. It is the sin of silence. It is the sin of letting Snape rot out the foundations of our religious, moral, and political values.

You may find it instructive to contrast the things I like with the things that Snape likes. I like listening to music. Snape likes putting our liberties at risk by an intransigent and obnoxious rush to defy the rules of logic. I like kittens and puppies. Snape likes corrupting our youth. I like spending time with friends. Snape likes threatening anyone who's bold enough to state that if he truly believes that violence directed at his opponents is morally justified, then maybe he should enroll in Introduction to Reality 101.

I'm worried you might not believe me when I state that it is a sad state of affairs when unimaginative, hotheaded deviants like Snape arrest and detain his adversaries indefinitely without charge, without trial, and without access to legal counsel. I know, seeing is believing. Therefore, the next time you see Snape make individuals indifferent to the survival of their families, be sure to remember that it's unfortunate that he has no real education. It's impossible to debate important topics with someone who is so mentally handicapped.

You may not be aware of this, but the point is that if everyone spent just five minutes a day thinking about ways to preserve the peace, we'd all be a lot better off. Is five minutes a day too much to ask for the promise of a better tomorrow? I sure hope not, but then again, the last time I told Snape's cultists that I want to call Snape's bluff they declared in response, “But cultural tradition has never contributed a single thing to the advancement of knowledge or understanding.” Of course, they didn't use exactly those words, but that's exactly what they meant.

Continue to appease Snape, and he will really inure us to mumpish despotism. The voices of his victims have not historically been chronicled. They have gone largely unnoticed and undocumented. What can we do about that? I suggest we start by creating a world in which fogyism, larrikinism, and Titoism are all but forgotten. Doing so will demonstrate to the world that serving in Snape's imperium is nothing short of nirvana for damnable harijans—no disagreements, no arguments, no reasoning, no thinking, no responsibility. Snape tells them what to do, and they do it. They never even consider that if we contradict Snape, we are labeled asinine knuckle-draggers. If we capitulate, however, we forfeit our freedoms. A final word: There is not a single word in that sentence that Mr. Snape can take exception to.

[sparkyukworcester]

Presumably cut and paste from the Internet given the American spelling of 'saviour' and use of z in 'generalizations' within. No one trying to sound that intellectual with his own words would make such a mistake.

Back to the thread, I believe Fishwick has been on holiday in Florida and has been stuck for flights. What a time to pick to go to the Sunshine State!

[Down The Pan]

Sept 17, 2017 19:37:08 GMT genghis said:

Sept 17, 2017 15:50:49 GMT zeke said:

No, you are if you believe Snape's lies. Let me tell you a little about John Snape.

I feel compelled to preface my remarks with the following: Mr. Snape 's lackeys have cooperated closely with treacherous Neanderthals on several projects. You see, I inarguably believe that Snape demands that his surmises be inoculated from inspection, criticism, and condemnation. And because of that belief, I'm going to throw politeness and inoffensiveness to the winds. In this letter, I'm going to be as rude and crude as I know how, to reinforce the point that Snape clearly believes that he acts in the public interest. He has apparently constructed a large superstructure of justifications for this a priori conclusion. I guess that shouldn't be too surprising given that Snape has been reviling everything in the most obscene terms and dragging it into the filth of the basest possible outlook. How can he perpetrate such an outrage against public propriety and decency? If you were to ask that of Snape, he'd certainly fling a large barrage of insults in your direction instead of actually addressing the question.

One of Snape's most loyal legates is known to have remarked, “Going through the motions of working is the same as working.” And there you have it: a direct quote from a primary source. The significance of that quote is that Snape says that censorship could benefit us. This is at best wrong. At worst, it is a lie.

It unequivocally shouldn't be necessary to have to say such things, but if Snape can overawe and befuddle a sufficient number of prominent individuals then it will become virtually impossible for anyone to counteract the subtle but pervasive social message that says that Snape's Lysenkoism movement consists entirely of lovable, cuddly people who would never dream of making individuals indifferent to the survival of their families. Too many parviscient menaces out there are looking for the quick and easy fix, for a great savior who will make it all right again so they can go back to sleep. They gather at the foot of the mount to herald the coming of Snape and neglect to notice that Snape's catty bruta fulmina have been helping a crotchety fringe take over WCFC. Still, I recommend you check out some of Snape's casus belli and draw your own conclusions on the matter.

Like a verbal magician, Snape knows how to lie without appearing to be lying, how to bury secrets in mountains of garbage-speak. Of course, he is utterly—and I mean utterly—mean-spirited. I say “of course” because he not only lies but brags about his lying to his janissaries. While there are many sullen, ultra-amateurish philosophunculists, Snape is the most grungy of the lot. He coins polysyllabic neologisms to make his excuses sound like they're actually important. In fact, his treatises are filled to the brim with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary.

Whether or not Snape should envelop us in a nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror ought to be a simple question, far beyond the realm of debate. However, he has been fostering a culture devoted to policing speech and punishing speakers. What's frightening is that this culture engenders patterns of thought that are surprisingly similar to those long identified by cognitive behavioral therapists as causes of depression and anxiety. I don't know about you, but I would prefer to live in a culture in which people are free to admit that Snape asserts that he is always being misrepresented and/or persecuted. I hate to sound a dissenting note, but this assertion is pure insanity. As Snape ought to know, the reality is that he doesn't want to acknowledge that his blandishments reek of so much exclusionism that the smell nauseates me. In fact, Snape would rather block all discussion on the subject. I suppose that's because he has for a long time been arguing that honesty and responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless. Had he instead been arguing that only the assembled and concentrated might of a national passion rearing up in its strength can ask him to rephrase his criticisms in a more reasoned way, I might cede him his point. As it stands, the leap of faith required to bridge the logical gap in Snape's arguments is simply too terrifying for me to contemplate. What I do often contemplate, however, is how you, of course, now need some hard evidence that it's time for him to grow up. Well, how about this for evidence: Snape plans to reward mediocrity. I don't know if Snape's bagmen are complicit in that scheme or are merely clueless. I do know, however, that Snape has been using all sorts of jiggery-pokery to convince people that his way of life is correct and everyone else's isn't. That worldview may be appealing, at least to dictatorial scaremongers, but it severely limits our national conversation on critical policy issues. Perhaps more painfully, Snape preys on the rebellious and disenfranchised, tricking them into joining his coalition of stuporous, unmannerly ingrates and execrable social outcasts. Their first assignment usually involves resorting to underhanded tactics. The lesson to draw from this is that Snape has no conception of our moral and ethical standards. I can reword my point as follows: Snape has got to go—and yesterday isn't soon enough.

When I say that Snape's generalizations are barbaric, I mean it. I don't mean that they remind me of something barbaric or that they have one or two barbaric characteristics. I mean that they are barbaric. In fact, the most barbaric thing about them is the way that they prevent people from seeing that we must help young people develop the ability to make informed and reasoned decisions for the public good as citizens of a culturally diverse, democratic society in an interdependent world. If we do, then perhaps a brighter day will dawn on planet Earth. Perhaps people will open their eyes and see that I don't need to tell you that I don't enjoy Snape's bawdy sense of humor. That should be self-evident. What is less evident is that Snape somehow forgot to tell his spokesmen that he's the panjandrum of conformism. From this anecdotal evidence I would argue that once you understand Snape's exhortations, you have a responsibility to do something about them. To know, to understand, and not to act, is an egregious sin of omission. It is the sin of silence. It is the sin of letting Snape rot out the foundations of our religious, moral, and political values.

You may find it instructive to contrast the things I like with the things that Snape likes. I like listening to music. Snape likes putting our liberties at risk by an intransigent and obnoxious rush to defy the rules of logic. I like kittens and puppies. Snape likes corrupting our youth. I like spending time with friends. Snape likes threatening anyone who's bold enough to state that if he truly believes that violence directed at his opponents is morally justified, then maybe he should enroll in Introduction to Reality 101.

I'm worried you might not believe me when I state that it is a sad state of affairs when unimaginative, hotheaded deviants like Snape arrest and detain his adversaries indefinitely without charge, without trial, and without access to legal counsel. I know, seeing is believing. Therefore, the next time you see Snape make individuals indifferent to the survival of their families, be sure to remember that it's unfortunate that he has no real education. It's impossible to debate important topics with someone who is so mentally handicapped.

You may not be aware of this, but the point is that if everyone spent just five minutes a day thinking about ways to preserve the peace, we'd all be a lot better off. Is five minutes a day too much to ask for the promise of a better tomorrow? I sure hope not, but then again, the last time I told Snape's cultists that I want to call Snape's bluff they declared in response, “But cultural tradition has never contributed a single thing to the advancement of knowledge or understanding.” Of course, they didn't use exactly those words, but that's exactly what they meant.

Continue to appease Snape, and he will really inure us to mumpish despotism. The voices of his victims have not historically been chronicled. They have gone largely unnoticed and undocumented. What can we do about that? I suggest we start by creating a world in which fogyism, larrikinism, and Titoism are all but forgotten. Doing so will demonstrate to the world that serving in Snape's imperium is nothing short of nirvana for damnable harijans—no disagreements, no arguments, no reasoning, no thinking, no responsibility. Snape tells them what to do, and they do it. They never even consider that if we contradict Snape, we are labeled asinine knuckle-draggers. If we capitulate, however, we forfeit our freedoms. A final word: There is not a single word in that sentence that Mr. Snape can take exception to.

Well at least he's not being accused of having a poo and not pulling the chain now!! But next time.........be original hey Genghis? Or at least give us some info that really matters about Snapper, like how's his house extension getting on? ........or why not have a wank instead, it would be quicker and more productive, and help you sleep. 

[genghis]

Your username is the epitome of originality.

[zeke]

Sometimes, less is more!

[Down The Pan]

On the basis that Genghis Khan had over 1200 children, and that 20% of the world population can trace their hereditary back to him, its not really surprising is it? And my Mums name is Hunt, so?

[Brooksiders Return!!]

Sept 17, 2017 19:37:08 GMT genghis said:

Sept 17, 2017 15:50:49 GMT zeke said:

No, you are if you believe Snape's lies. Let me tell you a little about John Snape.

I feel compelled to preface my remarks with the following: Mr. Snape 's lackeys have cooperated closely with treacherous Neanderthals on several projects. You see, I inarguably believe that Snape demands that his surmises be inoculated from inspection, criticism, and condemnation. And because of that belief, I'm going to throw politeness and inoffensiveness to the winds. In this letter, I'm going to be as rude and crude as I know how, to reinforce the point that Snape clearly believes that he acts in the public interest. He has apparently constructed a large superstructure of justifications for this a priori conclusion. I guess that shouldn't be too surprising given that Snape has been reviling everything in the most obscene terms and dragging it into the filth of the basest possible outlook. How can he perpetrate such an outrage against public propriety and decency? If you were to ask that of Snape, he'd certainly fling a large barrage of insults in your direction instead of actually addressing the question.

One of Snape's most loyal legates is known to have remarked, “Going through the motions of working is the same as working.” And there you have it: a direct quote from a primary source. The significance of that quote is that Snape says that censorship could benefit us. This is at best wrong. At worst, it is a lie.

It unequivocally shouldn't be necessary to have to say such things, but if Snape can overawe and befuddle a sufficient number of prominent individuals then it will become virtually impossible for anyone to counteract the subtle but pervasive social message that says that Snape's Lysenkoism movement consists entirely of lovable, cuddly people who would never dream of making individuals indifferent to the survival of their families. Too many parviscient menaces out there are looking for the quick and easy fix, for a great savior who will make it all right again so they can go back to sleep. They gather at the foot of the mount to herald the coming of Snape and neglect to notice that Snape's catty bruta fulmina have been helping a crotchety fringe take over WCFC. Still, I recommend you check out some of Snape's casus belli and draw your own conclusions on the matter.

Like a verbal magician, Snape knows how to lie without appearing to be lying, how to bury secrets in mountains of garbage-speak. Of course, he is utterly—and I mean utterly—mean-spirited. I say “of course” because he not only lies but brags about his lying to his janissaries. While there are many sullen, ultra-amateurish philosophunculists, Snape is the most grungy of the lot. He coins polysyllabic neologisms to make his excuses sound like they're actually important. In fact, his treatises are filled to the brim with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary.

Whether or not Snape should envelop us in a nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror ought to be a simple question, far beyond the realm of debate. However, he has been fostering a culture devoted to policing speech and punishing speakers. What's frightening is that this culture engenders patterns of thought that are surprisingly similar to those long identified by cognitive behavioral therapists as causes of depression and anxiety. I don't know about you, but I would prefer to live in a culture in which people are free to admit that Snape asserts that he is always being misrepresented and/or persecuted. I hate to sound a dissenting note, but this assertion is pure insanity. As Snape ought to know, the reality is that he doesn't want to acknowledge that his blandishments reek of so much exclusionism that the smell nauseates me. In fact, Snape would rather block all discussion on the subject. I suppose that's because he has for a long time been arguing that honesty and responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless. Had he instead been arguing that only the assembled and concentrated might of a national passion rearing up in its strength can ask him to rephrase his criticisms in a more reasoned way, I might cede him his point. As it stands, the leap of faith required to bridge the logical gap in Snape's arguments is simply too terrifying for me to contemplate. What I do often contemplate, however, is how you, of course, now need some hard evidence that it's time for him to grow up. Well, how about this for evidence: Snape plans to reward mediocrity. I don't know if Snape's bagmen are complicit in that scheme or are merely clueless. I do know, however, that Snape has been using all sorts of jiggery-pokery to convince people that his way of life is correct and everyone else's isn't. That worldview may be appealing, at least to dictatorial scaremongers, but it severely limits our national conversation on critical policy issues. Perhaps more painfully, Snape preys on the rebellious and disenfranchised, tricking them into joining his coalition of stuporous, unmannerly ingrates and execrable social outcasts. Their first assignment usually involves resorting to underhanded tactics. The lesson to draw from this is that Snape has no conception of our moral and ethical standards. I can reword my point as follows: Snape has got to go—and yesterday isn't soon enough.

When I say that Snape's generalizations are barbaric, I mean it. I don't mean that they remind me of something barbaric or that they have one or two barbaric characteristics. I mean that they are barbaric. In fact, the most barbaric thing about them is the way that they prevent people from seeing that we must help young people develop the ability to make informed and reasoned decisions for the public good as citizens of a culturally diverse, democratic society in an interdependent world. If we do, then perhaps a brighter day will dawn on planet Earth. Perhaps people will open their eyes and see that I don't need to tell you that I don't enjoy Snape's bawdy sense of humor. That should be self-evident. What is less evident is that Snape somehow forgot to tell his spokesmen that he's the panjandrum of conformism. From this anecdotal evidence I would argue that once you understand Snape's exhortations, you have a responsibility to do something about them. To know, to understand, and not to act, is an egregious sin of omission. It is the sin of silence. It is the sin of letting Snape rot out the foundations of our religious, moral, and political values.

You may find it instructive to contrast the things I like with the things that Snape likes. I like listening to music. Snape likes putting our liberties at risk by an intransigent and obnoxious rush to defy the rules of logic. I like kittens and puppies. Snape likes corrupting our youth. I like spending time with friends. Snape likes threatening anyone who's bold enough to state that if he truly believes that violence directed at his opponents is morally justified, then maybe he should enroll in Introduction to Reality 101.

I'm worried you might not believe me when I state that it is a sad state of affairs when unimaginative, hotheaded deviants like Snape arrest and detain his adversaries indefinitely without charge, without trial, and without access to legal counsel. I know, seeing is believing. Therefore, the next time you see Snape make individuals indifferent to the survival of their families, be sure to remember that it's unfortunate that he has no real education. It's impossible to debate important topics with someone who is so mentally handicapped.

You may not be aware of this, but the point is that if everyone spent just five minutes a day thinking about ways to preserve the peace, we'd all be a lot better off. Is five minutes a day too much to ask for the promise of a better tomorrow? I sure hope not, but then again, the last time I told Snape's cultists that I want to call Snape's bluff they declared in response, “But cultural tradition has never contributed a single thing to the advancement of knowledge or understanding.” Of course, they didn't use exactly those words, but that's exactly what they meant.

Continue to appease Snape, and he will really inure us to mumpish despotism. The voices of his victims have not historically been chronicled. They have gone largely unnoticed and undocumented. What can we do about that? I suggest we start by creating a world in which fogyism, larrikinism, and Titoism are all but forgotten. Doing so will demonstrate to the world that serving in Snape's imperium is nothing short of nirvana for damnable harijans—no disagreements, no arguments, no reasoning, no thinking, no responsibility. Snape tells them what to do, and they do it. They never even consider that if we contradict Snape, we are labeled asinine knuckle-draggers. If we capitulate, however, we forfeit our freedoms. A final word: There is not a single word in that sentence that Mr. Snape can take exception to.

Next time you want to tell us a little bit about John Snape, why don't you actually tell us a little bit about John Snape?  Oh, and forget fogyism, larrikinism and Titoism, I'd be quite happy with a new ground thank you !!

[Fred]

Sept 17, 2017 20:54:18 GMT Brooksiders Return!! said:

Sept 17, 2017 19:37:08 GMT genghis said:

No, you are if you believe Snape's lies. Let me tell you a little about John Snape.

I feel compelled to preface my remarks with the following: Mr. Snape 's lackeys have cooperated closely with treacherous Neanderthals on several projects. You see, I inarguably believe that Snape demands that his surmises be inoculated from inspection, criticism, and condemnation. And because of that belief, I'm going to throw politeness and inoffensiveness to the winds. In this letter, I'm going to be as rude and crude as I know how, to reinforce the point that Snape clearly believes that he acts in the public interest. He has apparently constructed a large superstructure of justifications for this a priori conclusion. I guess that shouldn't be too surprising given that Snape has been reviling everything in the most obscene terms and dragging it into the filth of the basest possible outlook. How can he perpetrate such an outrage against public propriety and decency? If you were to ask that of Snape, he'd certainly fling a large barrage of insults in your direction instead of actually addressing the question.

One of Snape's most loyal legates is known to have remarked, “Going through the motions of working is the same as working.” And there you have it: a direct quote from a primary source. The significance of that quote is that Snape says that censorship could benefit us. This is at best wrong. At worst, it is a lie.

It unequivocally shouldn't be necessary to have to say such things, but if Snape can overawe and befuddle a sufficient number of prominent individuals then it will become virtually impossible for anyone to counteract the subtle but pervasive social message that says that Snape's Lysenkoism movement consists entirely of lovable, cuddly people who would never dream of making individuals indifferent to the survival of their families. Too many parviscient menaces out there are looking for the quick and easy fix, for a great savior who will make it all right again so they can go back to sleep. They gather at the foot of the mount to herald the coming of Snape and neglect to notice that Snape's catty bruta fulmina have been helping a crotchety fringe take over WCFC. Still, I recommend you check out some of Snape's casus belli and draw your own conclusions on the matter.

Like a verbal magician, Snape knows how to lie without appearing to be lying, how to bury secrets in mountains of garbage-speak. Of course, he is utterly—and I mean utterly—mean-spirited. I say “of course” because he not only lies but brags about his lying to his janissaries. While there are many sullen, ultra-amateurish philosophunculists, Snape is the most grungy of the lot. He coins polysyllabic neologisms to make his excuses sound like they're actually important. In fact, his treatises are filled to the brim with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary.

Whether or not Snape should envelop us in a nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror ought to be a simple question, far beyond the realm of debate. However, he has been fostering a culture devoted to policing speech and punishing speakers. What's frightening is that this culture engenders patterns of thought that are surprisingly similar to those long identified by cognitive behavioral therapists as causes of depression and anxiety. I don't know about you, but I would prefer to live in a culture in which people are free to admit that Snape asserts that he is always being misrepresented and/or persecuted. I hate to sound a dissenting note, but this assertion is pure insanity. As Snape ought to know, the reality is that he doesn't want to acknowledge that his blandishments reek of so much exclusionism that the smell nauseates me. In fact, Snape would rather block all discussion on the subject. I suppose that's because he has for a long time been arguing that honesty and responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless. Had he instead been arguing that only the assembled and concentrated might of a national passion rearing up in its strength can ask him to rephrase his criticisms in a more reasoned way, I might cede him his point. As it stands, the leap of faith required to bridge the logical gap in Snape's arguments is simply too terrifying for me to contemplate. What I do often contemplate, however, is how you, of course, now need some hard evidence that it's time for him to grow up. Well, how about this for evidence: Snape plans to reward mediocrity. I don't know if Snape's bagmen are complicit in that scheme or are merely clueless. I do know, however, that Snape has been using all sorts of jiggery-pokery to convince people that his way of life is correct and everyone else's isn't. That worldview may be appealing, at least to dictatorial scaremongers, but it severely limits our national conversation on critical policy issues. Perhaps more painfully, Snape preys on the rebellious and disenfranchised, tricking them into joining his coalition of stuporous, unmannerly ingrates and execrable social outcasts. Their first assignment usually involves resorting to underhanded tactics. The lesson to draw from this is that Snape has no conception of our moral and ethical standards. I can reword my point as follows: Snape has got to go—and yesterday isn't soon enough.

When I say that Snape's generalizations are barbaric, I mean it. I don't mean that they remind me of something barbaric or that they have one or two barbaric characteristics. I mean that they are barbaric. In fact, the most barbaric thing about them is the way that they prevent people from seeing that we must help young people develop the ability to make informed and reasoned decisions for the public good as citizens of a culturally diverse, democratic society in an interdependent world. If we do, then perhaps a brighter day will dawn on planet Earth. Perhaps people will open their eyes and see that I don't need to tell you that I don't enjoy Snape's bawdy sense of humor. That should be self-evident. What is less evident is that Snape somehow forgot to tell his spokesmen that he's the panjandrum of conformism. From this anecdotal evidence I would argue that once you understand Snape's exhortations, you have a responsibility to do something about them. To know, to understand, and not to act, is an egregious sin of omission. It is the sin of silence. It is the sin of letting Snape rot out the foundations of our religious, moral, and political values.

You may find it instructive to contrast the things I like with the things that Snape likes. I like listening to music. Snape likes putting our liberties at risk by an intransigent and obnoxious rush to defy the rules of logic. I like kittens and puppies. Snape likes corrupting our youth. I like spending time with friends. Snape likes threatening anyone who's bold enough to state that if he truly believes that violence directed at his opponents is morally justified, then maybe he should enroll in Introduction to Reality 101.

I'm worried you might not believe me when I state that it is a sad state of affairs when unimaginative, hotheaded deviants like Snape arrest and detain his adversaries indefinitely without charge, without trial, and without access to legal counsel. I know, seeing is believing. Therefore, the next time you see Snape make individuals indifferent to the survival of their families, be sure to remember that it's unfortunate that he has no real education. It's impossible to debate important topics with someone who is so mentally handicapped.

You may not be aware of this, but the point is that if everyone spent just five minutes a day thinking about ways to preserve the peace, we'd all be a lot better off. Is five minutes a day too much to ask for the promise of a better tomorrow? I sure hope not, but then again, the last time I told Snape's cultists that I want to call Snape's bluff they declared in response, “But cultural tradition has never contributed a single thing to the advancement of knowledge or understanding.” Of course, they didn't use exactly those words, but that's exactly what they meant.

Continue to appease Snape, and he will really inure us to mumpish despotism. The voices of his victims have not historically been chronicled. They have gone largely unnoticed and undocumented. What can we do about that? I suggest we start by creating a world in which fogyism, larrikinism, and Titoism are all but forgotten. Doing so will demonstrate to the world that serving in Snape's imperium is nothing short of nirvana for damnable harijans—no disagreements, no arguments, no reasoning, no thinking, no responsibility. Snape tells them what to do, and they do it. They never even consider that if we contradict Snape, we are labeled asinine knuckle-draggers. If we capitulate, however, we forfeit our freedoms. A final word: There is not a single word in that sentence that Mr. Snape can take exception to.

Next time you want to tell us a little bit about John Snape, why don't you actually tell us a little bit about John Snape?  Oh, and forget fogyism, larrikinism and Titoism, I'd be quite happy with a new ground thank you !!

I would also be duly happy if he f*cked off

[B*ue dragonstander]

opinions reasonably held are one thing. Defamation injurious to a persons reputation is another. Just saying.