|
|
Post by tim on Oct 26, 2008 11:22:53 GMT
So that's the Trust's credibility shot down in message board flames then, or at least badly damaged.
Is it any wonder this club is in such a 2 & 8 when it's not just the board that shoot themselves in the foot, but the supporters as well? Feeding hands with bite marks are less likely to want to feed.....
|
|
BDS
Squad Member
Posts: 201
|
Post by BDS on Oct 26, 2008 12:43:10 GMT
I wonder if the Trust as a body actually posts on the MB. I figure not.
|
|
|
|
Post by creaner on Oct 26, 2008 12:47:21 GMT
I wonder if the Trust as a body actually posts on the MB. I figure not. This is where Trust info will be posted. I will update the site this aftenoon. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2008 15:16:15 GMT
I spoke to a number of people at the match yesterday - from board supporters through to die-hard anti board. There was only one thing they all agreed on - that it is unlikely that the club will survive far into the new year. And yet what do we get on here? Everyone tearing each other to pieces. Brilliant! It's like being on an airplane that's plummeting ground-wards - while we argue over who's ordered what in-flight meal. FFS stay focussed on what's really going on - the pilot's lost control of the plane!
|
|
|
|
Post by almasno9 on Oct 26, 2008 22:09:44 GMT
ealing - spot on sir.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tony is not to despondent now. on Oct 30, 2008 9:14:12 GMT
Malcolm whoever you are, are missing the point. The Club has not officially approached the Trust. i.e. a formal letter making the offer of a representative of the Trust on the board.
Only an informal approach.
|
|
BDS
Squad Member
Posts: 201
|
Post by BDS on Oct 30, 2008 19:13:58 GMT
Malcolm whoever you are, are missing the point. The Club has not officially approached the Trust. i.e. a formal letter making the offer of a representative of the Trust on the board.
Only an informal approach.Noted Webbtony but I didnt.Anyway we wont split hairs we will leave that to others. There is a lot of informality within the current set up! It is perfectly obvious what is being attempted by these sort of "informal" approaches to individuals and groups. You would have though that the Board would have more than enough to occupy them without resorting to these attempts to cosy up with anyone who might save them. Why dont they do the one thing that is needed and that is to act in a transparent and open way? |
|
|
|
Post by Tony is not to despondent now. on Oct 31, 2008 16:17:22 GMT
Agreed Malcolm. All the informal approaches were part of a smoke screen, to detract from what is really going on. And of course to start rumours to discredit certain people. Really underhand, and not clever either.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2008 19:14:15 GMT
And the only person to end up discredited was the rumour-monger. Poor fella, really got strung up like a kipper on that one!
|
|
