|
Post by richwidd on Sept 19, 2008 6:57:05 GMT
We have heard him in public meetings, BBC H & W and the Evening News. Does anyone believe a word he says?
|
|
|
Post by creaner on Sept 19, 2008 7:00:00 GMT
There will be development costs for professional fees of £250,000. Kerching!
|
|
|
Post by dave on Sept 19, 2008 7:32:42 GMT
I will be deciding on this in the next 24 hours and am hopeful of being able to vote on this poll shortly (as long as it is ok with St Modwen)
|
|
Mr T
Youth Teamer
Posts: 32
|
Post by Mr T on Sept 19, 2008 7:34:02 GMT
The "right man" and team have been waiting for the chance to take this club forward for a while now Mr Boddy - you just cannot or will not see it.
Why did you change the auditors before the deadline - did the previous auditors not like what was presented to them?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2008 8:15:17 GMT
What amazes me is that in this statement Mr boddy is in essence saying "We havent found anyone, neither have the Shareholders found anyone, who in my opinion has the qualities of Jon Prescott, Laurie Brown or Tony Partridge" Boddy obviously thinks that someone like Prescoot is more "appropriate" to run a football club than a man such as Barry Ward, who has already run 3 football clubs, all in severe financial trouble, and all left healthier after he left. I don't think I want to fight this out anymore, I'm just going to sit back and laugh!!! Just imagine if this was all kicking off at Kiddy? We'd be pissing ourselves, but its not, its happening at our club, its so pathetic that its now just plain funny. Anyone able to mend the clowns shoes in the Worcester News? I think DB needs one on the foot thats wedged in his mouth!!
|
|
|
Post by Tony is not to despondent now. on Sept 19, 2008 8:15:57 GMT
It does seem strange that the club changed auditors just before the deadline.
Another Boddy error, or was it deliberate to delay matters again?
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Sept 19, 2008 8:30:36 GMT
bet you can't guess how I have voted.
BODDY OUT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2008 8:59:00 GMT
"Boddy obviously thinks that someone like Prescoot is more "appropriate" to run a football club.." Well he obviously thinks he's the man most suitable to run a social club. So why not?
|
|
rocky
Youth Teamer
Posts: 15
|
Post by rocky on Sept 19, 2008 12:34:23 GMT
It does seem strange that the club changed auditors just before the deadline. Another Boddy error, or was it deliberate to delay matters again? From past experience of the audit industry, and given the timing, it may be that the auditors have resigned as they disagree with the directors over something within the said accounts. This is ususally the last course of action by an audit firm, and the most desperate as it costs them a fee, if there is a disagreement. I have only ever seen it as a last resort when the directors refuse to include something within their accounts which should be there for them to show a true and fair view to the shareholders. It effectively represents an irretrievable breakdown in the relationship. Surely the WN should have pressed on this, and other DB answers?
|
|
|
Post by tim on Sept 19, 2008 12:51:58 GMT
Scary, but true. There is more to this.
|
|
|
Post by gobby cow on Sept 19, 2008 17:49:10 GMT
I would assume the auditors were giving them yet another adverse auditors report.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2008 17:54:04 GMT
I don't think the auditors were giving them anything, without a little something in return
|
|
andyc
Reserve Teamer
Posts: 60
|
Post by andyc on Sept 19, 2008 21:46:03 GMT
Jeremy, surely you do not mean that you think the auditors might not have been paid so the club had no choice but to change auditors?
|
|