|
Post by Noboddy aka Lord Ealing on Mar 28, 2017 13:14:02 GMT
I don't suppose Boddy and co even knew about section 106 when he signed away the ground. It's an obligation that can be imposed on a sale to developers that (among other things) can insist that funds from the developer is paid to the local council to assist with community/green issues. I know nothing about developers etc - but then neither did Boddy. It could have helped with a new ground scheme maybe? www.pas.gov.uk/3-community-infrastructure-levy-cil/-/journal_content/56/332612/4090701/ARTICLE
|
|
|
Post by Tim Munslow on Mar 28, 2017 14:38:49 GMT
But it won't help us now surely? We will be the developers; it is us who could be levied.
|
|
|
Post by Noboddy aka Lord Ealing on Mar 28, 2017 16:40:43 GMT
I think it only applies to projects containing sheltered housing - as this is often a pre-requisite of developments these days. It may well have been something that was lost in the development of SGL - along with several million pounds.
|
|