Directors' Dynamism

[Deleted]

I assume the board are driving forward with plans to stabilise the club, and are working closely with the ST to achieve this? It would surely be a mistake to interpret their silence as inactivity?

[jimbo]

That is such a cynical thought Lord Ealing. My guess is that they are having in depth meetings with The Trust, who have been actually been excluded from said meetings !!

[Brooksiders Return!!]

Lord Ealing, I dare say that is exactly what is happening - haha!!, at the EGM, the shareholders gave them a mandate to push forward with the same business plan as they have been working to over the last 10 years, so they should be driving on with that. The Supporters Trust and a group of shareholders proposed a viable alternative, but that has now gone by the wayside. There is no "working closely" between the Board and the ST, it is for the Board to carry out their plan, and the ST should leave them to carry this out unfettered. We clearly don't back their business plan, it hasn't worked for the last 10 years, there's no reason why it should now, but we should let them get on with it.
Rumour has it that the Board want to resign, which would be rather negative, and considering they fought so hard to discredit any plans other than their own, it would be disappointing to see that they don't have courage in their convictions.
No, we must now leave Hampson, Layland, Wilcox, Murphy and Pinches to execute the business plan and to run the business in the way that they want to run the business. Don't expect to hear anything about what is going on, only shareholders get any information, and very little at that. Fans? sorry , you are just a revenue generation line in the accounts!

[Deleted]

Lying to the electorate; winning an election - and then resigning before disappearing into the debris? This has a familiar ring to it.

[Brooksiders Return!!]

Indeed, they've made their bed, they must be prepared to continue to lie in it! They did a good job of discrediting our plans, so its only fair that we let them get on with their capital funding plans. There is of course a fatal flaw in their plans, as it stands, they can only raise a maximum of 140,000 pounds and with a limit on 3,000 shares, they're going to need to find at least 50 new investors! Unless of course they U turn and ask for a constitutional change via an EGM!! And they can't issue more shares, because Hampson has already told shareholders that he won't dilute share value!! Still, good luck to them, they know all the answers. In Hampson, Layland, Murphy, Wilcox and Pinches we trust!

[Deleted]

It's a good job major political events like a referendum aren't run on lies and resignations.

Oh...........