|
|
Post by thesecondjack on Mar 14, 2016 16:55:50 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Mar 14, 2016 17:09:31 GMT
Well I guess being asked to make changes doesn't mean go away it cannot be built at Perdiswell.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brooksiders Return!! on Mar 14, 2016 17:12:14 GMT
Read into this what you like, and remember, the Press do like to be mischievous at times. What is being talked about here are planning issues, and neither party discussed the planning application (or were in a position to discuss the planning application) at the private talks. And all that Rob Crean and Marc Bayliss have been quoted as saying was that the talks were positive - and they were.
It keeps the club firmly in the media spotlight though!
|
|
|
|
Post by citytoon on Mar 14, 2016 17:13:25 GMT
Sounds like some kicking into the long grass going on. Need me to pull together another banner ;-)
"During the talks the club agreed to seriously consider any alternatives if they were offered one, and in turn the council agreed to treat the trust's Perdiswell planning application fairly."
How very decent of the Council...
|
|
|
|
Post by Brooksiders Return!! on Mar 14, 2016 17:17:22 GMT
Sounds like some kicking into the long grass going on. Need me to pull together another banner ;-) "During the talks the club agreed to seriously consider any alternatives if they were offered one, and in turn the council agreed to treat the trust's Perdiswell planning application fairly." How very decent of the Council... Exactly, no news in here at all. Just read that sentence and you'll see it says absolutely nothing at all! |
|
|
|
Post by thesecondjack on Mar 14, 2016 17:20:37 GMT
Well, if I'm trying to be upbeat - it's good that the trust has been talking to the council, and that the council and yourselves have gone on record saying that the talks were positive.
If I'm being cynical, I'd probably say that it's just delaying tactics by the council so that the application isn't heard until after the May elections.
I guess we'll have to wait and see.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brooksiders Return!! on Mar 14, 2016 17:34:10 GMT
When the application is heard is down to the planning officers and not the council
|
|
|
|
Post by creaner on Mar 14, 2016 17:42:27 GMT
I think that the council are now fully aware of what we are trying to achieve at Perdiswell and it was a good opportunity to put that directly to Marc Bayliss; whether it is supported down the line remains to be seen. If the council believe they have options that need to be considered we are duty bound to listen but we have been clear that we need to get this decision right and ensure and that we put in place a long term solution to securing the club's future and not just short term political expediency.
Just for clarity the updates to the planning application were requested by the planners, as they have been throughout the planning process, not the council, and will be with planning case officer today. Next step then is for him to have the next consultation discussions.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2016 20:20:58 GMT
Maybe they now expect pyramids and a U boat on the canal?
|
|
|
|
Post by Croc on Mar 14, 2016 23:09:08 GMT
It's the lack of that bloody massive radiator isn't it?
|
|
|
|
Post by Tim Munslow on Mar 16, 2016 11:38:07 GMT
When I was secretary to a council for a period the Chairman's favourite tactic, if he didn't want something to happen, was to form a sub-committee or working party to look at the issue.
|
|
|
|
Post by thesecondjack on Mar 24, 2016 14:38:38 GMT
An interesting read on the PPP facebook page: (click the photo to enlarge)  |
|
|
|
Post by Woodenose on Mar 24, 2016 14:50:16 GMT
Worcester Observer through the door today. They are asking for readers' views about where Worcester City FC should call home. Here's a chance for City fans to get their voice heard! Email your opinion to editor@worcesterobserver.co.uk. Make sure you spread this email address around City fans everywhere!
|
|
|
|
Post by Woodenose on Mar 24, 2016 14:57:01 GMT
FOOTBALL pitches which have been left to rot in Worcester are getting a £336,000 revamp - finally bringing them back into use after a long campaign.
Worcester City Council has announced a plan to reinstate six pitches at Perdiswell playing fields four years after they were condemned.
From the Worcester News on line
|
|
|
|
Post by Croc on Apr 6, 2016 8:15:11 GMT
According to what I heard from involved parties last night - apparently, Bayliss or one of his grouping stood up in the City Council Meeting last night and stated that the club have now been informed of the "alternative sites" for the Community Hub and Stadium.
Can anyone confirm or deny this? I'm waiting for the Minutes of the meeting last night to go up online to have a further look as to what exactly was said...
|
|
|
|
Post by citytoon on Apr 6, 2016 12:05:55 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Woodenose on Apr 6, 2016 12:10:33 GMT
Still no commitment from this Tory concil |
|
