|
|
Post by danjohnson_wcfc on Sept 14, 2012 15:59:38 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by City4Eva on Sept 15, 2012 17:19:21 GMT
Decent game today. We struggled with the 4-3-3 formation, but looked a much better side when Carl changed to 4-2-2. Substitutions also made a big difference, especially Breeze and Reece, who both looked lively..
With better choices in the final 3rd the score could have have been far more comfortable.
Overall, well pleased with more to come, and Thorley again was outstanding!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by The Verner on Sept 15, 2012 17:22:36 GMT
4-2-2 that's a new formation.
Don't think the shape changed just the personnel, valuable three points with some above us losing today.
|
|
rob
Reserve Teamer
Posts: 79
|
Post by rob on Sept 15, 2012 23:16:27 GMT
The bbc red button has the attendance at 325! Im guessing that's an error!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Tony is not to despondent now. on Sept 16, 2012 7:36:02 GMT
The bbc red button has the attendance at 325! Im guessing that's an error!! And so did the Blue Square North results on their web page. |
|
|
|
Post by JohnInglisIsGod on Sept 16, 2012 7:56:28 GMT
The bbc red button has the attendance at 325! Im guessing that's an error!! And so did the Blue Square North results on their web page. Official attendance yesterday was 806. It was on our results page immediately after the game as such too. No idea where the various news outlets got their figure as we officially reported it as 806 at half time. |
|
|
|
Post by birdfeeder on Sept 16, 2012 8:44:20 GMT
The bbc red button has the attendance at 325! Im guessing that's an error!! And so did the Blue Square North results on their web page. I don't know who runs the conference site but their league table buts us as W4 D4 L0 and don't say that name thats on the tip of your tongue. |
|
fin
Youth Teamer
Posts: 23
|
Post by fin on Sept 16, 2012 9:01:58 GMT
I also noticed that we appeared to have drawn 0-0 away to Gainsborough last week and sit on 16 points according to that website
|
|
|
|
Post by jupu on Sept 16, 2012 9:03:13 GMT
Perhaps it's just me but I thought it was scrappy yesterday. Yes we worked hard but I thought the penalty decision was a bit fortunate. But it sounds like Carl had a gameplan and it worked.
|
|
oxford
First Teamer
Posts: 406
|
Post by oxford on Sept 16, 2012 21:01:49 GMT
I agree.It was one of those pens that you shout for when it will be in your favour(usually more in hope than expectation)but would be fuming if it was given against you.If I had been the ref I have to say I don't think I would have given it but that's probably why I'm not one(apart from being almost too old and definitely too fat!)
|
|
|
|
Post by JohnInglisIsGod on Sept 17, 2012 8:55:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Tim Munslow on Sept 17, 2012 19:14:13 GMT
Just good to get the three points. Droylsden have been a bit of a bogey side for us. Was surprised that Birley was substituted: yes, I know he gave the ball away for their goal, but thought he'd had a decent game up to then.
I also thought the pen was a bit fortunate: and having looked at the video replay I'm even more convinced it wasn't a pen. Still, next time it could work against us, so we'll take it.
|
|
|
|
Post by auldreekie on Sept 17, 2012 20:54:05 GMT
Thanks for the video highlights. The pitch looks in great shape and with only one club playing on it this season may just prove to be our secret weapon come January/February, Cracking downward header to create the first goal - almost impossible for the keeper to deal with. On only the evidence of the video clip - and action replay - definite penalty! Excusing the pun the Bloods defender was all over Matt Breeze like a leech!
|
|
