|
|
Post by ac on Mar 24, 2012 8:14:19 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by stalyvegas on Mar 24, 2012 17:41:58 GMT
Seems a bit unfair 10 man Stalybridge against 12 man Worcester.  |
|
|
|
Post by cityontheup on Mar 24, 2012 17:55:36 GMT
Stalyvegas i am not sure what match you were watching, if you where actually watching the match. The amount of time you spent rolling around on the floor wasting time was rediculous, for full time players you ofered nothing Worcester were by a long way the better team.
|
|
|
|
Post by stalyvegas on Mar 24, 2012 18:59:16 GMT
Stalyvegas i am not sure what match you were watching, if you where actually watching the match. The amount of time you spent rolling around on the floor wasting time was rediculous, for full time players you ofered nothing Worcester were by a long way the better team. You didn't offer much yourself's against 10 men plus the ref was on your side. Getting back to the match I thought we defended well with 10 men and deserved a draw. |
|
|
|
Post by The Verner on Mar 24, 2012 19:05:12 GMT
Stalyvegas i am not sure what match you were watching, if you where actually watching the match. The amount of time you spent rolling around on the floor wasting time was rediculous, for full time players you ofered nothing Worcester were by a long way the better team. You didn't offer much yourself's against 10 men plus the ref was on your side. Getting back to the match I thought we defended well with 10 men and deserved a draw. Is that why we booed the ref off at the end (not our star player that you suggested we did on non league forum) because he was on our side, give over. Mind you at least he booked your time wasting players and got the red card decision spot on, he got a clear penalty decision incorrect though !! I will take a draw as it keeps us in the hunt with everyone above us having much tougher games left with some against each other. |
|
|
|
Post by stalyvegas on Mar 24, 2012 19:25:23 GMT
You didn't offer much yourself's against 10 men plus the ref was on your side. Getting back to the match I thought we defended well with 10 men and deserved a draw. Is that why we booed the ref off at the end (not our star player that you suggested we did on non league forum) because he was on our side, give over. Mind you at least he booked your time wasting players and got the red card decision spot on, he got a clear penalty decision incorrect though !! I will take a draw as it keeps us in the hunt with everyone above us having much tougher games left with some against each other. You had a star player you'll have to point him out there was nothing special about any of your players. |
|
|
|
Post by The Verner on Mar 24, 2012 19:30:20 GMT
Our keeper is a fantastic player, mind you one shot on goal by your strikers in 90 minutes isnt the best way for me to prove that !!
|
|
|
|
Post by stalyvegas on Mar 24, 2012 19:40:37 GMT
Our keeper is a fantastic player, mind you one shot on goal by your strikers in 90 minutes isnt the best way for me to prove that !! Actually we had 3 shots on target to your 4 on target nothing in the match really. |
|
|
|
Post by Tim Munslow on Mar 24, 2012 19:44:10 GMT
City played their hearts out today and - had Michael Taylor put away the two chances that came his way - would have deservedly won.
Stalybridge were lucky to end the game with 10 men - their number ten should have been red-carded for that awful challenge on Dormand as well as the other player who was rightly sent off for another awful foul. As for the ref being on our side well that's a joke. Stalybridge showed why they are full-time professionals - they have been coached in how to timewaste and roll around on the floor as if poleaxed : and the ref fell for it most of the time.
What a load of cheating wimps.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Verner on Mar 24, 2012 19:47:15 GMT
City played their hearts out today and - had Michael Taylor put away the two chances that came his way - would have deservedly won. Stalybridge were lucky to end the game with 10 men - their number ten should have been red-carded for that awful challenge on Dormand as well as the other player who was rightly sent off for another awful foul. As for the ref being on our side well that's a joke. Stalybridge showed why they are full-time professionals - they have been coached in how to timewaste and roll around on the floor as if poleaxed : and the ref fell for it most of the time. What a load of cheating wimps. Full Time !! Never !! They were as bad as Redditch !! |
|
|
|
Post by stalyvegas on Mar 24, 2012 19:49:25 GMT
City played their hearts out today and - had Michael Taylor put away the two chances that came his way - would have deservedly won. Stalybridge were lucky to end the game with 10 men - their number ten should have been red-carded for that awful challenge on Dormand as well as the other player who was rightly sent off for another awful foul. As for the ref being on our side well that's a joke. Stalybridge showed why they are full-time professionals - they have been coached in how to timewaste and roll around on the floor as if poleaxed : and the ref fell for it most of the time. What a load of cheating wimps. How do you know they weren't hurt? I don't think you do! |
|
|
|
Post by cityontheup on Mar 24, 2012 21:14:44 GMT
I don't know how you can talk about our players Stalyvegas, for full time players your players were not that good apart from your number 5 who I thought had a great game. He is the only one I would swap for any of our players. As for time wasting you are the worst side I have seen.
|
|
|
|
Post by stalyvegas on Mar 24, 2012 21:22:01 GMT
I don't know how you can talk about our players Stalyvegas, for full time players your players were not that good apart from your number 5 who I thought had a great game. He is the only one I would swap for any of our players. As for time wasting you are the worst side I have seen. Don't forget we were down to 10 men so you have to expect a bit of time wasting. Everybody does it in similar circumstances I think Worcester would have wasted time. |
|
stamoo
First Teamer
Posts: 349
|
Post by stamoo on Mar 24, 2012 22:12:04 GMT
City played well, they were back on song after last week, passing the ball around and they were the only side trying to play constructive football. On another day, with a small slice of luck, we would have taken the three points. Stalybridge defended well and closed us down in the final third, which meant Greg Mills and Michael Taylor had a relatively quiet day, although of course Michael was unlucky not to get on the scoresheet. If Stalybridge had spent less time whingeing and trying to bully the referee and more time trying to play football we may have had a more entertaining game. The return of Jimmy D and Stu Whitehead added some solidity down the middle and Matt B's return added some bite in midfield. Poor Symo was yet again given little protection and twice had his shirt ripped and torn without any sanction from the ref. I was pleased to see that we didn't let this knock us out of our stride, this City team can play a bit and are not intimidated by loudmouthed bullying tactics. Well done City the applause from the fans at the end shows how much your efforts were appreciated, we have played far worse and won. We have an easier run in than some of those above us so keep it going City, I would rather you keep trying to play passing attacking football and fail to make the play off's than adopt the Stalybridge method of defensive cynicism.
|
|
|
|
Post by stalyvegas on Mar 24, 2012 22:35:59 GMT
City played well, they were back on song after last week, passing the ball around and they were the only side trying to play constructive football. On another day, with a small slice of luck, we would have taken the three points. Stalybridge defended well and closed us down in the final third, which meant Greg Mills and Michael Taylor had a relatively quiet day, although of course Michael was unlucky not to get on the scoresheet. If Stalybridge had spent less time whingeing and trying to bully the referee and more time trying to play football we may have had a more entertaining game. The return of Jimmy D and Stu Whitehead added some solidity down the middle and Matt B's return added some bite in midfield. Poor Symo was yet again given little protection and twice had his shirt ripped and torn without any sanction from the ref. I was pleased to see that we didn't let this knock us out of our stride, this City team can play a bit and are not intimidated by loudmouthed bullying tactics. Well done City the applause from the fans at the end shows how much your efforts were appreciated, we have played far worse and won. We have an easier run in than some of those above us so keep it going City, I would rather you keep trying to play passing attacking football and fail to make the play off's than adopt the Stalybridge method of defensive cynicism. Not too easy playing constructive football on the worst pitch in BSN your players are used to playing on a badly ploughed field our players aren't. This is a man's game I think your team are a bunch of winging girls what you call defensive cynicism is robust competitive tackling don't your boy's know what a tackle is? or do your boy's expect teams to go there and allow them to play. |
|
|
|
Post by cityontheup on Mar 24, 2012 22:52:58 GMT
you obviously haven't been to many BSN grounds if you think ours is the worst in the league. If you want to talk about being girls look at your own team and the way they roll around every time they get tackled, very manly.
|
|
|
|
Post by jupu on Mar 24, 2012 23:41:08 GMT
If I was a Stalybridge fan I'd be really pleased with my team's performance. If you're not winning then coming to Worcester and avoiding defeat is job done. On another day Michael Taylor would have scored at least one of those two second half chances and we would have won. It looked as if one goal would decide it and I can only remember them having one effort on target. Pity we pumped too many high balls into the box as their keeper was going to take those all afternoon long.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tony is not to despondent now. on Mar 25, 2012 7:41:39 GMT
City played well, they were back on song after last week, passing the ball around and they were the only side trying to play constructive football. On another day, with a small slice of luck, we would have taken the three points. Stalybridge defended well and closed us down in the final third, which meant Greg Mills and Michael Taylor had a relatively quiet day, although of course Michael was unlucky not to get on the scoresheet. If Stalybridge had spent less time whingeing and trying to bully the referee and more time trying to play football we may have had a more entertaining game. The return of Jimmy D and Stu Whitehead added some solidity down the middle and Matt B's return added some bite in midfield. Poor Symo was yet again given little protection and twice had his shirt ripped and torn without any sanction from the ref. I was pleased to see that we didn't let this knock us out of our stride, this City team can play a bit and are not intimidated by loudmouthed bullying tactics. Well done City the applause from the fans at the end shows how much your efforts were appreciated, we have played far worse and won. We have an easier run in than some of those above us so keep it going City, I would rather you keep trying to play passing attacking football and fail to make the play off's than adopt the Stalybridge method of defensive cynicism. Not too easy playing constructive football on the worst pitch in BSN your players are used to playing on a badly ploughed field our players aren't. This is a man's game I think your team are a bunch of winging girls what you call defensive cynicism is robust competitive tackling don't your boy's know what a tackle is? or do your boy's expect teams to go there and allow them to play. Winging criticism, YOU can talk!!! |
|
|
|
Post by Tony is not to despondent now. on Mar 25, 2012 7:45:24 GMT
Was Symons injured?
But when Edwards came on, oh dear!! Everything went downhill. He has plenty of dash but no end product.
|
|
|
|
Post by cityontheup on Mar 25, 2012 8:06:38 GMT
Not so worried about Edwards, for me the problem is our attacking options. When Symo came off yesterday or if Michael comes of we lack anyone to replace them. For me DCB does not cut it he has no energy and never looks like scoring. To be honest I would rather see Corbett back at least he put himself around and got into the box.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 25, 2012 9:54:48 GMT
Corbett > Carey-Bertram
Really started to get frustrated with Edwards also. He lacks the final bit of quality, which is a shame as I like the lad. He succeeds at beating his man and getting free and then just falters at the last.
Stalyvegas - you haven't got a clue!
Overall a very good performance and we were unlucky not to get the 3 points.
With the exception of Gainsborough, results went out way too.
Let's hope Nuneaton give them a clobbering on Tuesday!
|
|
|
|
Post by andy on Mar 25, 2012 11:30:59 GMT
Though overall I do tend to agree, it has to be pointed out that
Danny Edwards did put to the ball in the right place for Michael Taylor's second chance.
And he did put the ball in that led to Mills's goal against Gainsborough.
So, I am not convinced that I am not convinced.
|
|
|
|
Post by adycrean on Mar 25, 2012 12:23:04 GMT
Stalybridge are not an easy team to like - they played ugly, but defended well for their point. They looked much inferior to the side that beat us in our away fixture.
On a positive note - I thought Birley did well partnering O'Connor in midfield, and we looked very solid at the back. Weir was excellent - though does anyone know what his injury was?
|
|
oxford
First Teamer
Posts: 406
|
Post by oxford on Mar 25, 2012 13:26:41 GMT
I suppose we should regard it as a massive compliment that a full time team, who have been around the top of the table all season , should consider a point at Worcester to be such a good result that they were prepared to put 100% of their effort into achieving this with no thought for trying to get all three points.I didn't appreciate their "antics"any more than anyone else but,if I were a Celtic fan, I would be well pleased and I would be more than happy for us to do the same if circumstances demanded it!Better to be a hypocrite with a point on the board that a purist with none!
|
|
|
|
Post by andy on Mar 25, 2012 13:34:52 GMT
Weir was excellent - though does anyone know what his injury was? It looks like Tyler went to hospital with an injury to his hand |
|
|
|
Post by stalyvegas on Mar 25, 2012 15:05:24 GMT
Corbett > Carey-Bertram Really started to get frustrated with Edwards also. He lacks the final bit of quality, which is a shame as I like the lad. He succeeds at beating his man and getting free and then just falters at the last. Stalyvegas - you haven't got a clue! Overall a very good performance and we were unlucky not to get the 3 points. With the exception of Gainsborough, results went out way too. Let's hope Nuneaton give them a clobbering on Tuesday! You're the one who doesn't have a clue we had a good goal disallowed we should have had a penalty when Tyler Weir tripped Jack rea in the box but we didn't get anything from the referee all afternoon and you didn't have the ability to beat 10 men. You mention our game Tuesday you need to be more interested in your own team because worcester might get a clobbering from Boston Tuesday night and you have to travel to Nuneaton yourself's before the end of the season. |
|
|
|
Post by cityontheup on Mar 25, 2012 15:26:29 GMT
All I can say stalyvegas is ignorance must be bliss in Stalybridge.
|
|
|
|
Post by stalyvegas on Mar 25, 2012 16:06:23 GMT
All I can say stalyvegas is ignorance must be bliss in Stalybridge. You'll have to explain that one, I know you had your chances but you're ignorant about what we did and I thought we did well against your 12 men with our 10 men. |
|
|
|
Post by The Verner on Mar 25, 2012 16:17:52 GMT
All I can say stalyvegas is ignorance must be bliss in Stalybridge. Give Stalyvegas a break !! Its hard for Stalybridge fans as it is knowing Hyde United are a bigger club than them, all this winding him up is not needed !  |
|
|
|
Post by cityontheup on Mar 25, 2012 16:26:55 GMT
You had a good goal disallowed, I could be wrong but the only time I rememeber the ball going in the net was after the whistle had gone so really and truely your player should have been booked. I don't remember any taackle by Tyler Wier and there being a big penalty shout by your players. Also I suggest you check your maths as I seem to remember it being 11 against 10. This whole thing about the referee being bias is rediculous, your player was rightly sent off he went sliding in three or four times and took the ball cleanly so it was only a matter of time before he mistimed one. Your number 10 was lucky to still be on the field after the way he ran into our keeper, he was never going to get the ball nor had any intention of going for it. Your players were bending the referees ear all match. The referee did not have a good match but to say it was all one way is stupid.
|
|
