niels
City Legend
Posts: 1,741
|
Post by niels on Mar 8, 2010 14:49:22 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by birdfeeder on Mar 8, 2010 15:58:54 GMT
But we can still give you both barrals over your icelandic banks owing us loads of money. |
|
niels
City Legend
Posts: 1,741
|
Post by niels on Mar 8, 2010 16:05:46 GMT
You can try if you want but I will just play the vegan, teetotaller or atheist card.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2010 16:48:14 GMT
I object to my atheism being protected against discrimination like a religious group, it makes atheism seem like a religious order, when its clearly not.
The idea of Vegans being protected is ridiculous, just because they don't like to eat certain foods then so what, its their choice, no-one forced them to go without bacon sandwiches? And teetotallers? whatever next, how about alcoholics?
On a more serious note, how about non-smokers? Why are we discriminated against? Smokers are able to leave work as often as they like to have a smoke, but non-smokers can't leave the workplace on such a regular basis to have a wander around or an hourly poo!
Oh and can't the Vegans find a more plausible spokesman than one-legged gold-digger Heather Mills??
|
|
niels
City Legend
Posts: 1,741
|
Post by niels on Mar 8, 2010 17:09:25 GMT
If you get your non-smokers amendment through then that will be four protections for me. I reckon no-one will be able to touch me then, as I will probably be in a very small minority making a lot of noise!
|
|
|
|
Post by DazaB on Mar 8, 2010 17:25:03 GMT
Are Worcester City fans protecteD?
|
|
niels
City Legend
Posts: 1,741
|
Post by niels on Mar 8, 2010 17:27:38 GMT
Is that protected with a capital D?
|
|
|
|
Post by birdfeeder on Mar 8, 2010 17:38:48 GMT
Are Worcester City fans protecteD? Yes they are a in dangered species. |
|
|
|
Post by prestonwcfc on Mar 8, 2010 18:42:48 GMT
Apart from when I was stood near the H&R goal on Saturday. Certainly no danger of being shot at anyway !! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by suv on Mar 8, 2010 19:21:59 GMT
If you get your non-smokers amendment through then that will be four protections for me. I reckon no-one will be able to touch me then, as I will probably be in a very small minority making a lot of noise! Hippy |
|
niels
City Legend
Posts: 1,741
|
Post by niels on Mar 8, 2010 21:10:17 GMT
Oi big time Charlie, you're not too big to go over my knee you know.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2010 9:20:25 GMT
Before you do that, I don't think sado-masochists are a protected minority, unless of course they are government ministers!!
|
|
|
|
Post by B*ue dragonstander on Mar 9, 2010 13:51:22 GMT
I object to my atheism being protected against discrimination like a religious group, it makes atheism seem like a religious order, when its clearly not. The idea of Vegans being protected is ridiculous, just because they don't like to eat certain foods then so what, its their choice, no-one forced them to go without bacon sandwiches? And teetotallers? whatever next, how about alcoholics? On a more serious note, how about non-smokers? Why are we discriminated against? Smokers are able to leave work as often as they like to have a smoke, but non-smokers can't leave the workplace on such a regular basis to have a wander around or an hourly poo! Oh and can't the Vegans find a more plausible spokesman than one-legged gold-digger Heather Mills?? Probably but she is more of a vegetable than most |
|
