|
Post by Mark on Mar 7, 2009 10:15:24 GMT
If no one else is going to start the predictions off, then I will....... Surely City won't throw this one away I'll go for a 2-0 in front of 632.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2009 10:39:05 GMT
0-1 582
|
|
|
Post by birdfeeder on Mar 7, 2009 11:02:07 GMT
3-1 to the City att 593 if we are lucky.
|
|
|
Post by Tony is not to despondent now. on Mar 9, 2009 9:04:36 GMT
Mark got the score corroect. Ealing almost forecast the correct attendance.
But Birdfeeder was completely out of it with his forecast.
|
|
|
Post by birdfeeder on Mar 9, 2009 14:18:52 GMT
Mark got the score corroect. Ealing almost forecast the correct attendance. But Birdfeeder was completely out of it with his forecast. att 588 and I said 593 thats 5 out which is one less then Ealing so I was the nearest,back to school for you Mr Webb.
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Mar 9, 2009 15:09:05 GMT
Mark got the score corroect. Ealing almost forecast the correct attendance. But Birdfeeder was completely out of it with his forecast. Do I get a prize!!
|
|
|
Post by birdfeeder on Mar 9, 2009 15:39:29 GMT
Mark got the score corroect. Ealing almost forecast the correct attendance. But Birdfeeder was completely out of it with his forecast. Do I get a prize!! You said 2-0 and I said 3-1 which is two clear goals so its a draw.
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Mar 9, 2009 20:32:08 GMT
You said 2-0 and I said 3-1 which is two clear goals so its a draw. It doesn't really matter does it? but the score was 2-0 not 3-1.
|
|