|
Post by Bonzo Bitburg on Oct 31, 2017 16:16:02 GMT
Oh so that was about the Palf exclusion was it? I wonder if wr4change is Palf in which case that's gonna be awkward next time I see him. Tehe woops.
Tell you what though those kids were so appalling all game. Someone should have grabbed them round the throat a long time ago.
|
|
|
Post by Brooksiders Return!! on Oct 31, 2017 16:22:57 GMT
Amidst all the Hollywood-style mutual back-slapping about the decision to pursue Perdiswell, coupled with posts loaded with derision, hatred and scorn for anything they don't like, from the trolls who hide behind the safety of their nom-de-plumes, perhaps it would be as well to consider the other point of view. So, acting as devil's advocate if nothing else, I would ask these two questions:- 1) Has it ever struck anyone that the Supporters Trust might just be WRONG in pursuing their appeal? 2) If there were 41 people at the meeting (I think that was the figure quoted on here) and the average attendance at "home" games this season is 355 (not including last Saturday) then those 41 people represent under 12% (one eighth) of the true supporters who pay at the gate, so how can they claim to be acting on behalf of the supporters? I sense a growing disconnect between The Supporters Trust and the actual supporters. So ok you organise a meeting of the true supporters and ask them what they want, before you make such vacuous statements - Simon Pitt. No non de plume here. I think you did that yourself Si !!
|
|
|
Post by The Verner on Oct 31, 2017 16:27:28 GMT
Oh so that was about the Palf exclusion was it? I wonder if wr4change is Palf in which case that's gonna be awkward next time I see him. Tehe woops. Tell you what though those kids were so appalling all game. Someone should have grabbed them round the throat a long time ago. I am only guessing from the comment and the comment previously. Happy for said person to come and sit down and have a chat with me. Paul is happy to sit down with them as well
|
|
|
Post by Brooksiders Return!! on Oct 31, 2017 16:42:44 GMT
Who the f**k is Paul?
|
|
|
Post by The Verner on Oct 31, 2017 16:44:27 GMT
Exactly, look at the post....he mentions Paul....I have no idea who he is. Hampton I can guess
|
|
|
Post by Brooksiders Return!! on Oct 31, 2017 16:47:23 GMT
I'm Paul...and so is my wife! Time for a new nom de plume methinks!
|
|
|
Post by wr4change on Oct 31, 2017 17:17:28 GMT
Firstly I am a genuine Supporter who cares about the club make no mistake about that.
I am not a troll like down the lane.
I am not Tony Palfrey, although I do believe he was poorly treated and the louts were let off.
I have ideas and I could make a very positive contribution to The Trust but having seen the tone of the messages on here written by Committee Members I think I would be better suited channelling my efforts elsewhere.
I will not apologise for any of my comments about individuals.
When I type on this smart phone the predictive text spells "Hampson as "Hampton", "leyland" as "Paul and" - I didn't take the time to reread the message , my mistake.
|
|
|
Post by wr4change on Oct 31, 2017 17:21:38 GMT
I am not obsessed with the Trust Membership number.
I had assumed it was 1000+.
The actual number shows that there is more scope for improvement in recruitment, ideas, commitment and sharing the workload
|
|
|
Post by Bonzo Bitburg on Oct 31, 2017 17:32:46 GMT
I love it when people say it's going to be their last posting on here. For the record this also going to be my last posting on this message board.
|
|
|
Post by wr4change on Oct 31, 2017 17:39:51 GMT
I had said probably
I was asked questions to which I have replied
|
|
Fred
Reserve Teamer
Posts: 129
|
Post by Fred on Oct 31, 2017 17:44:34 GMT
Firstly I am a genuine Supporter who cares about the club make no mistake about that. I am not a troll like down the lane. I am not Tony Palfrey, although I do believe he was poorly treated and the louts were let off. I have ideas and I could make a very positive contribution to The Trust but having seen the tone of the messages on here written by Committee Members I think I would be better suited channelling my efforts elsewhere. I will not apologise for any of my comments about individuals. When I type on this smart phone the predictive text spells "Hampson as "Hampton", "leyland" as "Paul and" - I didn't take the time to reread the message , my mistake. Treated poorly .....he grabbed a young adult by the throat...i saw this and so did a number of other people ! And ive heard the Club have spoken to the kids, youths, young adults and their mother about their behaviour moving forward. How about take people up on the offer of a sit down and a chat ? How about contacting the trust board directing your help directly to them ?
|
|
|
Post by Bonzo Bitburg on Oct 31, 2017 17:51:11 GMT
I had said probably I was asked questions to which I have replied Unfortunately I didn't so I can't reply. Oh Darn!!
|
|
|
Post by wr4change on Oct 31, 2017 18:04:52 GMT
They should have all been treated the same, either ban them all or warn them all.
I have spoken to members of the Trust whom I respect, however, having read messages and seen the views of other trust committee members on here I know I couldn't work with them.
Sit and chat about what?
|
|
|
Post by genghis on Oct 31, 2017 19:36:10 GMT
Palfrey is the same idiot who tried to get people to boycott New Touch hairdressers because they wouldn’t cut his Grandson’s hair.
Think about that. He took it upon himself to try and destroy someone’s business, their livelihood, because he was unhappy he had to travel a bit further to another hairdresser’s.
I have no sympathy for that clown.
|
|
|
Post by maybe1day on Oct 31, 2017 19:52:36 GMT
Get your facts right, it was his son . Why on earth is this important he probably can't stand you.... Palfrey is the same idiot who tried to get people to boycott New Touch hairdressers because they wouldn’t cut his Grandson’s hair. Think about that. He took it upon himself to try and destroy someone’s business, their livelihood, because he was unhappy he had to travel a bit further to another hairdresser’s. I have no sympathy for that clown.
|
|
|
Post by genghis on Oct 31, 2017 21:36:49 GMT
Get your facts right, it was his son . Why on earth is this important he probably can't stand you.... Palfrey is the same idiot who tried to get people to boycott New Touch hairdressers because they wouldn’t cut his Grandson’s hair. Think about that. He took it upon himself to try and destroy someone’s business, their livelihood, because he was unhappy he had to travel a bit further to another hairdresser’s. I have no sympathy for that clown. Already explained why it was ‘important’. Also, according to his own facebook it was his Grandson. m.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100008929963180Might want to get your own facts straight before spouting your mouth off. Saves you looking like a fool.
|
|