|
|
Post by andy on Aug 7, 2007 15:47:00 GMT
As reported by DJ, that well-known Hinckley fan ...
Gez Murphy "got injured in a one-on-one with Scott Bevan today (Saturday 4th August) against Kidderminster. Bevan didn't mean anything nasty just caught Murphy on his knee when he slid through the ball. Murphy went to the floor immediatley not moving and after physio plus doctor had been on, he had to be stretchered off the pitch in a leg splint. The doctor believes that it is not broken outright, but possibly a small fracture. The true extent of the injury is not yet known, but could be up to 2 months if is as bad as it looked.
So that means Leon Kelly suspended for two months and Gez Murphy injured for two months (plus?). At least we know who will be starting up front for Hinckley next week, we've only got 2 strikers left... "
Striking differences from last year surrounding the injury, but another tough blow for a CN striker on the last Saturday before the season proper.
|
|
|
|
Post by Oogly Boogly on Aug 7, 2007 16:59:03 GMT
What happened to him last year then?
|
|
|
|
Post by andy on Aug 7, 2007 17:13:40 GMT
Dunno.
|
|
|
|
Post by Oogly Boogly on Aug 7, 2007 17:19:53 GMT
just wondering what its 'shades of' and why you say there are striking differences from last year surrounding the injury, as if you are aware of something that happened last year. Sorry but your post though informative makes no sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by andy on Aug 7, 2007 17:27:56 GMT
A CN striker injured in the last friendly before the season starts playing against Kidderminster Harriers.
Try that for a clue! ;-)
Here's a clue as to the difference as to the events surrounding the injury. This time it was not so striking.
|
|
|
|
Post by Oogly Boogly on Aug 7, 2007 17:45:40 GMT
Oh I see, you're just stirring up a bit of s*** there. A player gets injured in a game and you try and relate this to Webby getting iinjured. How small minded.
|
|
|
|
Post by alwaysnextyear on Aug 7, 2007 17:50:10 GMT
Andy - forget it !
I agree. The City v Kiddy game is history. Injuries happen, always have, always will. As far as I know, the referee is the sole judge of whether they are accidental or not, and the referee did not award a foul when Webster was injured. Simple as that.
|
|
|
|
Post by andy on Aug 7, 2007 18:29:14 GMT
I wasnt stirring any sh*t. I just said that a CN striker got a bad injury playing in the last pre-season friendly against Kidderminster. That is the relation to Webster.
Show me where the evidence of the spoon, please!!
So far, and in the space of a month, you've called me a tw*t and small-minded. Nice one, fella. Good to make friends, isnt it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Oogly Boogly on Aug 7, 2007 18:59:21 GMT
Try 'Shades of' as the title. I'm sure plenty of other strikers have got bad injuries in pre-season friendlies yet you haven't seen fit to comment on them. There's actually no 'shades of' anything here, just another injury, they happen as Alwaysnextyear points out. There's no link of any kind here so why try to make one?
Yes it is good to make friends and the good thing about friends is you can choose them. Sorry if I don't choose you.
|
|
|
|
Post by andy on Aug 7, 2007 19:05:54 GMT
Do you always see life in such black and white?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2007 19:09:10 GMT
Terrific. The season hasn't even started yet - and we're already falling out with each other.
I might as well join in.
TW Dragonstander smells like poo.
|
|
|
|
Post by Oogly Boogly on Aug 7, 2007 19:34:10 GMT
Do you always see life in such black and white? No, but when you see people like you being mischeivous in their postings you can see why Andy Morrison made the comments that he did about cancers on the internet. You know damn well when you posted that you were trying t ocreate a link between two unrelated injuries. there was no need to post on it, other than to bring back memories of Webbys injury, and get ther Kiddy knockers going, possibly get a couple of postings from kiddy fans fanning the flames too. Just let it go Mr Andy and get on with the new season and supporting our promotion bid. Thats what matters and not raking up the past, or are we also going to be raking up incidents involving Tamworth and Andy Ellis too? Good job Gloucester City arent in our league, we wouldn't want any repeats of the Wright/ Tuohy elbow incident would we? Just let it go. |
|
|
|
Post by creaner on Aug 7, 2007 19:41:11 GMT
Terrific. The season hasn't even started yet - and we're already falling out with each other. I might as well join in. TW Dragonstander smells like poo. And Creaner is a bald headed flibbertigibbet and an idle fop! |
|
|
|
Post by andy on Aug 7, 2007 19:55:07 GMT
First of all, OB, you chose to pose an interpretation on my post that was incorrect - I know what I meant. When I inform you that your interpretation was not what I was meaning, you insist that you are right and you persist - for the third or fourth time, in telling me that I really meant something else. You also resort to abuse.
Yes, I was making a link with Webster picking up an injury in the final friendly of the season against Kiddy Harriers, because Gez Murphy has also. End of, as far as the original post goes.
Had I wanted to do what you imply, I would have headed the post something like 'Kiddy do it again', and quoted Simon's post off the Hinckley Message Board. You will perhaps take note that I didnt, and in fact did the exact opposite, first because that wasnt my point and second because DJ states that Bevan did not do anything nasty.
You are now suggesting that I intend to deliberately inflame Kiddy fans.
I hope you can see the differences in all this, and work out where they are coming from.
|
|
|
|
Post by Oogly Boogly on Aug 7, 2007 21:15:13 GMT
Okay, so actually you are posting to let people know about two unrelated and unlinked events that are strikingly different, the only thing in common being they are friendlies against Kiddy Harriers. Well thanks for that.
So can you explain what you mean by
'Here's a clue as to the difference as to the events surrounding the injury. This time it was not so striking.'
What do you mean by 'not so striking?'
|
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Aug 7, 2007 21:42:49 GMT
Personally think there should be an Annual celebration of 'Cretin-gate'..........  Maybe a c*rpet-beating marathon for charity........... |
|
|
|
Post by Croc on Aug 8, 2007 10:11:33 GMT
I like cake
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2007 10:59:41 GMT
"I like cake"
What sort of comment is that? Do you expect us all to like cake? What sort of cake? And what about trifle?
|
|
|
|
Post by wakefield on Aug 8, 2007 11:11:15 GMT
FFS Ealing!!!
And what sort of comment is that?? (The usual inane 'witty' one I suspect??)
It's about time you got your act together and supported the team rather than dribble on about 'cake'.....
|
|
|
|
Post by Croc on Aug 8, 2007 11:16:51 GMT
Cake?
Don't even get me started on the subject of quiche...
|
|
|
|
Post by wakefield on Aug 8, 2007 11:21:11 GMT
Ham and Egg pie??
Disgusting.
Do the Board know about this?? Whats AP going to do as well??
Scandalous! And the season hasn't yet started
|
|
|
|
Post by Croc on Aug 8, 2007 12:09:52 GMT
Sack The Chef
|
|
|
|
Post by B*ue dragonstander on Aug 9, 2007 8:40:14 GMT
Terrific. The season hasn't even started yet - and we're already falling out with each other. I might as well join in. TW Dragonstander smells like poo. I agree. He is a useless good for nowt. I hope he never crosses my path again! BDS was all right but this bloke ... words fail me! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 9, 2007 9:56:48 GMT
How often do you intend to change your name?
|
|
|
|
Post by B*ue dragonstander on Aug 9, 2007 12:47:15 GMT
Never Again !
|
|
|
|
Post by dorothy on Aug 9, 2007 15:35:18 GMT
I like Jaffa Biscuits, or is it Cake?
|
|
|
|
Post by tim on Aug 9, 2007 16:22:01 GMT
I like Traffic Lights.
|
|
|
|
Post by creaner on Aug 10, 2007 7:51:33 GMT
I like Jaffa Biscuits, or is it Cake? Interesting... Apparently because "Biscuits and cakes are considered a necessity by UK law and are zero rated. Chocolate-covered biscuits however are a luxury and subject to VAT at 17.5%. McVities and HM Customs & Excise2 argued over whether the Jaffa Cake was a cake (no VAT) or a chocolate biscuit (lots of VAT)." the tax man wanted to charge VAT on Jaffa "cakes". McVitties argued that the difference between a cake and a biscuit is that a cake hardens when it goes stale but a biscuit softens. Jaffa cakes are therefore not charged the extra. The above may or may not be actually true but I like the story |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2007 8:09:44 GMT
"the difference between a cake and a biscuit is that a cake hardens when it goes stale but a biscuit softens."
Then I must have a biscuit in my pants.
|
|
|
|
Post by voiceofreason on Aug 10, 2007 10:14:53 GMT
So no takers for 'Cretin-gate;The Movie', then?
|
|
