|
|
Post by lackey on Sept 16, 2017 14:51:00 GMT
Stop it Mr Genghis, or we'll come round and poo in your kitchen.
|
|
|
|
Post by genghis on Sept 16, 2017 15:05:34 GMT
Keep all your threats to yourself. I know that's how your sort operate but it doesn't work on me. Looks like you can give it out (making unsubstantiated allegations about everyone from the management to the Supporters Trust, to ordinary users on here) - but you haven’t the stones to suck it up when you get it back mildly in return. You’re a lampoon. Looks like the hypocritical lady doth protest too much... Chill bro, I'm taking the piss. |
|
|
|
Post by lackey on Sept 16, 2017 15:36:43 GMT
How dare you take the piss out of us Lackeys, you horrible little person you
|
|
|
|
Post by B*ue dragonstander on Sept 16, 2017 15:37:35 GMT
The board has no intention of pursuing PW, nor Perdiswell come to that. They just want to drag the planning agony out so they can use up any assets left from the SGL sale. PW is a waste of time and that's the point. A red herring like that distracts any attention from the real goings on. The longer "supporters" hand money over to these charlatans the longer they'll have to rob WCFC, and the longer it will be before a new club emerges. At least we know the price of fish now. £100,000 for a single red herring. The fishing fleet at Yarmouth will be being rebuilt as I write. Is there no limit to how much the City Council are prepared to spend in an attempt to sideswipe Perdiswell and preserve their control of the Council? No wonder other budgets are being cut when a local authority can even consider doling out this sort of cash on a project that will never happen. By involving the Club and WFA I imagine they are trying to provide some veil of legality to this proposal although I doubt they will spend anything until the appeal on Perdiswell is determined. To do otherwise would surely expose the Councillors to the possibility of an investigation? |
|
|
|
Post by downthelane on Sept 17, 2017 8:30:55 GMT
Let me tell you what will never happen, Perdiswell Stadium. Perhaps the club has learnt from the Trust's mistakes that you have to work with the Council.
|
|
|
|
Post by creaner on Sept 17, 2017 9:08:23 GMT
Let me tell you what will never happen, Perdiswell Stadium. Perhaps the club has learnt from the Trust's mistakes that you have to work with the Council. I'm sure you're right. Thank God the club have now taken control of the whole thing. What were the trust thinking of! Naive twats. The leadership of Kim Jung Hampson will see us through to the promised land. Cheerybye! |
|
|
|
Post by jupu on Sept 17, 2017 9:11:34 GMT
I know some people struggle to pick up a leaflet when they are handed out at matches, so here is a copy of what was distributed yesterday.  |
|
oxford
First Teamer
Posts: 406
|
Post by oxford on Sept 17, 2017 9:38:43 GMT
As the fans have never been lied to before I am sure everything is all rosy then.
|
|
|
|
Post by Noboddy aka Lord Ealing on Sept 17, 2017 10:36:26 GMT
We are where we want to be.
|
|
|
|
Post by Woodenose on Sept 17, 2017 11:43:30 GMT
Let me tell you what will never happen, Perdiswell Stadium. Perhaps the club has learnt from the Trust's mistakes that you have to work with the Council. You have missed out one word before Council, that word is Tory.Labour would have passed Perdiswell,at least the trust made an effort some time ago to try and help. Your friends on the board have done nothing, except bleed money from this club. Look where we are today with the actions they have taken |
|
|
|
Post by downthelane on Sept 17, 2017 13:08:13 GMT
It is called party politics my friend. The trust befriended Labour's Gregson and the failed prospective MP - hasn't got them too far.
|
|
|
|
Post by Woodenose on Sept 17, 2017 13:36:31 GMT
It is called party politics my friend. The trust befriended Labour's Gregson and the failed prospective MP - hasn't got them too far. It is because the wrong party are in power,fast forward 2 years and who knows? I understand that the club were offered Perdiswell 15 years ago.Anyway the majority of city shareholders voted for a change in the constitution,but were out voted by the few "big boy's" that wanted to stay "in control" of the club and with no real interest in the shareholders or supporters. As I said look where we are now thanks to the people in power at the club |
|
|
|
Post by downthelane on Sept 17, 2017 13:40:19 GMT
Good point, let's wait two years and hope that Labour are in power.
|
|
|
|
Post by Croc on Sept 17, 2017 14:18:10 GMT
It is called party politics my friend. The trust befriended Labour's Gregson and the failed prospective MP - hasn't got them too far. Whereas the Board have licked the arses of the Tories and are getting a free handout and land from it. It’ll be interesting to see DUP FC playing there on a few decades time. Maybe they’ll change the kit back to all blue and alter the badge to boot. We could suggest the below:  |
|
|
|
Post by richwidd on Sept 17, 2017 14:49:09 GMT
It is called party politics my friend. The trust befriended Labour's Gregson and the failed prospective MP - hasn't got them too far. Make your mind up Downthelane. By the way, where's the money gone? |
|
|
|
Post by downthelane on Sept 17, 2017 20:35:31 GMT
Dunno Rich, as you were on the Board you tell us.
|
|
|
|
Post by richwidd on Sept 18, 2017 16:22:58 GMT
Dunno Rich, as you were on the Board you tell us. Why don't you ask me at the next shareholders meeting. |
|
|
|
Post by colonelcrispy on Sept 18, 2017 19:58:50 GMT
I live near Perdiswell and am neutral about the siting of the proposed football ground. However, the split between the supporters trust and club seems to me to be a gift to opponents of any new ground. By dividing resources you have left yourselves weak. Why don't you get together, compromise somehow and put up a united proposal to set up your new ground somewhere ( perdiswell included ) TOGETHER - much better chance of bringing WFC back to Worcester.
|
|
|
|
Post by Noboddy aka Lord Ealing on Sept 18, 2017 22:03:35 GMT
We're fully aware of this. The board have refused to co-operate with anyone, be it the Trust or even individuals. They don't reveal their plans or involve anyone in discussions. There hasn't been an agm for ages - so even shareholders are in the dark. If we could work with the board we would, but it's impossible.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brooksiders Return!! on Sept 18, 2017 22:40:37 GMT
The Board don't co-operate with shareholders, or even each other. The split isn't between the Board and the Trust, it exists within the Boardroom itself, where some know whats going on, and others are kept in the dark. There are four members of the Board, that's all, but two aren't advised of whats going on by the other two, but do nothing about it. Ask Colin Layland about the benefits of a CBS, and you'd be staggered at his lack of knowledge, despite the fact that the Board engaged a Birmingham law firm who specialise in providing guidance to companies moving to community ownership!
|
|
|
|
Post by cloud on Sept 19, 2017 6:26:35 GMT
Parsonage Way is being debated by the council today.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brooksiders Return!! on Sept 19, 2017 6:40:52 GMT
But not from a planning perspective. This is not a planning meeting, it is a resources meeting, to agree on a release of funds to assess the feasibility of Parsonage Way in terms of a future planning proposal. Apparently some people are under the impression that planning consent will be approved today!!
|
|
|
|
Post by cloud on Sept 19, 2017 7:23:06 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by B*ue dragonstander on Sept 19, 2017 15:46:01 GMT
Feeble reporting by the WO. Just respewing the same ol crud nearly all of which is factually incorrect. I could go on but this puerile article doesn't deserve a detailed response.
|
|
|
|
Post by downthelane on Sept 19, 2017 19:29:49 GMT
Is WCFCSTTV at the meeting filming
|
|
stamoo
First Teamer
Posts: 349
|
Post by stamoo on Sept 19, 2017 20:19:39 GMT
"Coun Roger Knight raised his concerns the proposed rent of £1 per year for five years was low. Council officers confirmed further talks would take place over a profit share should the club become successful." PROFIT SHARE?  !! LOL |
|
|
|
Post by jupu on Sept 19, 2017 21:34:05 GMT
There was no filming at the meeting.
|
|
|
|
Post by cloud on Sept 20, 2017 11:32:49 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by alwaysnextyear on Sept 20, 2017 13:20:02 GMT
No chance of it happening - it's just a political smoke and mirrors game.
It will be rightfully opposed by residents as the site is totally inappropriate, not on any bus routes, next to a site of Special Interest, ancient woodland, etc etc.
It has no chance of getting through planning based on the exact criteria used to turn down Perdiswell which has already got the infrastructure in place !
The only factual part of the report is that Anthony Hampson " declined to comment ".........again. He must be saving his voice for the 2016 AGM that Colin Layland is still arranging !
|
|
|
|
Post by wr4wolf on Sept 20, 2017 19:25:33 GMT
Don't understand why media & public aren't all over this as it's a disgrace that the council are willing to invest £100,000 of our money into the feasibility of this site when Perdiswell is, in comparison, a far better alternative.
Added to the whole sorry saga, we now have the council showcasing the new playing fields at Perdiswell with the City youth teams and labelling it as a great community facility!
If the club board had any nous they would be playing on this and telling the council exactly why Perdiswell is the right location.
Even if Parsonage Way moves forward why as the prospective user would you chose to develop an agricultural field over a plot of land that literally just needs the stadium building on it, with all the associated infrastructure already in place?
I thought the whole thing was a complete farce years ago but this just takes it to a new level where you start to think you are imagining it!
|
|
!! LOL